Rates of macular volume changes in different stages and courses of primary open-angle glaucoma
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202521721Keywords:
glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, macular pathophysiology, primary open-angle glaucoma pathophysiology, primary open-angle glaucoma diagnosisAbstract
Purpose: To examine macular volume changes as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and rates of these changes in different stages and courses of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
Material and Methods: Totally, 123 patients (191 eyes; 54 men and 69 women; age, 48 to 69 years) with POAG were included in the study and underwent examination. Of these eyes, 67 were found to have pre-perimetric glaucoma and 124, perimetric POAG. At 5 years after enrollment in the study, the rate of macular volume change was assessed in 118 eyes. Examination included routine eye examination, static automated perimetry and OCT. POAG was classified as progressive or stabilized on the basis of annual rate of mean deviation (MD) change. The control group comprised 27 healthy individuals (54 eyes).
Results: Macular volume was smaller in patients with perimetric glaucoma than in those with pre-perimetric glaucoma and decreased with an increase in the stage of glaucoma. We found macular volume to be positively moderately correlated with the annual rate of MD change (r = 0.6649, p < 0.05). Throughout a five-year study period, there was a reduction in the macular volume in 52.8% of eyes with pre-perimetric glaucoma and 59.7% of eyes with perimetric glaucoma (p > 0.05). A reduction in the macular volume was seen significantly more frequently among eyes with progressive perimetric POAG than among eyes with stabilized POAG (67.8% versus 45.9%; χ2 = 4.46; р < 0.05).
Conclusion: Macular volume positively moderately correlated with the annual rate of MD change in eyes with POAG. Macular volume was significantly smaller in eyes with perimetric POAG than in controls and eyes with preperimetric POAG, and significantly decreased with an increase in the stage of glaucoma. A reduction in the macular volume over time was almost 1.5 times more common in eyes with progressive perimetric POAG than in eyes with stabilized perimetric POAG.
References
Jayaram H, Kolko M, Friedman DS, Gazzard G. Glaucoma: now and beyond. Lancet. 2023 Nov 11; 402(10414):1788-1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01289-8
Michels TC, Ivan O. Glaucoma: Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2023 Mar; 107(3):253-262.
Zhang N, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 2;11(1):13762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w
Kang JM, Tanna AP. Glaucoma. Med Clin North Am. 2021 May;105(3):493-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2021.01.004
Wiggs JL, Pasquale LR. Genetics of glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2017 Aug 1;26(R1):R21-R27. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx184
Almasieh M, Wilson AM, Morquette B, Cueva Vargas JL, Di Polo A. The molecular basis of retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012 Mar;31(2):152-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.11.002
Zeng Z, You M, Fan C, Rong R, Li H, Xia X. Pathologically high intraocular pressure induces mitochondrial dysfunction through Drp1 and leads to retinal ganglion cell PANoptosis in glaucoma. Redox Biol. 2023 Jun;62:102687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2023.102687
Nuschke AC, Farrell SR, Levesque JM, Chauhan BC. Assessment of retinal ganglion cell damage in glaucomatous optic neuropathy: Axon transport, injury and soma loss. Exp Eye Res. 2015 Dec;141:111-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.06.006
Li Q, Cheng Y, Zhang S, Sun X, Wu J. TRPV4-induced Müller cell gliosis and TNF-α elevation-mediated retinal ganglion cell apoptosis in glaucomatous rats via JAK2/STAT3/NF-κB pathway. J Neuroinflammation. 2021 Nov 17;18(1):271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02315-8
Maes ME, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. BAX to basics: How the BCL2 gene family controls the death of retinal ganglion cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017 Mar;57:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.01.002
Miao Y, Zhao GL, Cheng S, Wang Z, Yang XL. Activation of retinal glial cells contributes to the degeneration of ganglion cells in experimental glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2023 Mar;93:101169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101169
Barisić F, Sicaja AJ, Ravlić MM, Novak-Laus K, Iveković R, Mandić Z. Macular thickness and volume parameters measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) for evaluation of glaucoma patients. Coll Antropol. 2012 Jun;36(2):441-5.
Giovannini A, Amato G, Mariotti C. The macular thickness and volume in glaucoma: an analysis in normal and glaucomatous eyes using OCT. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 2002;236:34-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.80.s236.44.x
Lederer DE, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, Heltzer J, Velazques LJ, Fujimoto JG, et al. Analysis of macular volume in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun; 135(6):838-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(02)02277-8
Ojima T, Tanabe T, Hangai M, Yu S, Morishita S, Yoshimura N. Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun; 51(3):197-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-006-0433-y
Begum VU, Jonnadula GB, Yadav RK, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Choudhari NS, et al. Scanning the macula for detecting glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;62(1):82-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.126188
Liesegang TJ. Glaucoma: changing concepts and future directions. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 Jul;71(7):689-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63007-3
Chen Q, Huang S, Ma Q, Lin H, Pan M, Liu X, et al. Ultra-high resolution profiles of macular intra-retinal layer thicknesses and associations with visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 7;7:41100. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41100
Ortín-Martínez A, Salinas-Navarro M, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Jiménez-López M, Valiente-Soriano FJ, García-Ayuso D, et al. Laser-induced ocular hypertension in adult rats does not affect non-RGC neurons in the ganglion cell layer but results in protracted severe loss of cone-photoreceptors. Exp Eye Res. 2015 Mar;132:17-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.01.006
Nakano N, Ikeda HO, Hangai M, Muraoka Y, Toda Y, Kakizuka A, et al. Longitudinal and simultaneous imaging of retinal ganglion cells and inner retinal layers in a mouse model of glaucoma induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 11;52(12):8754-62. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6654
Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 May 15;107(5):453-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(89)90488-1
Zhang X, Francis BA, Dastiridou A, Chopra V, Tan O, Varma R, et al. Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Analyses of Age Effects on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness by Fourier-Domain OCT. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 4; 5(2):1.
Ueda K, Kanamori A, Akashi A, Tomioka M, Kawaka Y, Nakamura M. Effects of Axial Length and Age on Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Inner Macular Parameters Measured by 3 Types of SD-OCT Instruments. J Glaucoma. 2016 Apr; 25(4):383-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000216
Murthy RK, Diaz M, Chalam KV, Grover S. Normative data for macular volume with high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis). Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):546-51. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000582
Panchenko NV, Gonchar EN, Arustamova GS, Pereiaslova AS, Prikhod'ko DO, Friantseva MV. Influence of the fetal neuropeptide complex on changes in retinal light sensitivity over time in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. J of Ophthalmology (Ukraine). 2017;6:16-19. https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201761619
Panchenko MV, Duras IG, Honchar ON, Prikhodko DO, Pereiaslova AS, Avilova LG. Choroidal thickness in patients with progressive and stabilized POAG. J of Ophthalmology (Ukraine). 2018;6:19-22. https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201861922
Greenfield DS, Bagga H, Knighton RW. Macular thickness changes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy detected using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan; 121(1):41-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.1.41
Wang YM, Hui VWK, Shi J, Wong MOM, Chan PP, Chan N, et al. Characterization of macular choroid in normal-tension glaucoma: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec; 99(8):e1421-e1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14829
Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Akagi T, Saunders LJ, Yarmohammadi A, Manalastas PIC, et al. Progressive Macula Vessel Density Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Longitudinal Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;182:107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.011
Yarmohammadi A, Zangwill LM, Diniz-Filho A, Suh MH, Yousefi S, Saunders LJ, et al. Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density and Severity of Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016 Dec; 123(12):2498-2508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.041
Hou H, Moghimi S, Zangwill LM, Shoji T, Ghahari E, Penteado RC, et al. Macula Vessel Density and Thickness in Early Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar; 199:120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.11.012
Lin F, Qiu Z, Li F, Chen Y, Peng Y, Chen M, et al. Macular and submacular choroidal microvasculature in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 May;107(5):650-656. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319557
Saruhan Y, Hasler PW, Gugleta K. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Progression in Glaucoma Patients with Unchanged Topical Treatment over 3 Years - Retrospective Observational Cohort Analysis. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2023 Apr; 240(4):467-471. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2004-4943
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Panchenko M. V., Honchar O. M., Panchenko G. Iu., Kitchenko I. V.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.