Effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on ocular hydro- and hemodynamics in rabbits with experimental glaucoma

Authors

  • I. M. Mikheytseva SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»
  • N. I. Khramenko SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»
  • S. G. Kolomiichuk SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»
  • T. I. Siroshtanenko SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»
  • Maiar Alobisi SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202564247

Keywords:

glaucoma, pathogenesis, ACE inhibitor zofenopril, intraocular pressure, ocular hydrodynamics, ocular hemodynamics, rheographic quotient, experiment

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor zofenopril on the intraocular pressure (IOP), rheographic quotient (RQ) and tonographic parameters of the eye in a rabbit model of adrenaline-induced glaucoma (AIG).

Methods: In group 1 (12 animals), experimental glaucoma was induced by injecting 1:1000 adrenaline 0.1 ml through the auricle vein every other day for 3 months (40 injections totally). In group 2 (12 animals), glaucomatous animals received an aqueous suspension (1 ml) of zofenopril orally at a dose of 1 mg/kg daily for 3 months. The control group comprised 10 intact rabbits. Rabbit eyes were assessed by ophthalmoscopy and biomicroscopy. A Maklakoff tonometer was used for IOP measurements. Ocular hydro- and hemodynamics were assessed. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were employed to assess group differences.

Results: In group 1, mean IOP statistically significantly increased by 28.3%, 34.2% and 46.7% at days 30, 60 and 90, respectively, compared to baseline (р < 0.05). Additionally, mean IOP statistically significantly increased at all time points compared to controls. In group 2, at day 60 and day 90, IOP was 19.6% and 29.6% lower, respectively, compared to group 1. In non-treated glaucomatous animals, at day 90, RQ was decreased by 37.0%, tonographic aqueous humor (AH) outflow facility (C) was decreased by 36.8%, AH production was increased by 23.0% and tonographic IOP (P0) was increased by 61.4% compared to controls. In glaucomatous animals treated with zofenopril, at day 90, RQ and C were 45.7% and 41.7%, respectively, higher, and AH production and P0 were 24.1% and 22.4%, respectively, lower compared to non-treated glaucomatous animals.

Conclusion: In rabbits with AIG, ocular blood flow and ocular hydrodynamics parameters were impaired in the presence of elevated IOP. Zofenopril had a beneficial effect on the function of eyes with AIG (i.e., the IOP, parameters of ocular hemodynamics and AH circulation).

Author Biographies

I. M. Mikheytseva, SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»

Iryna M. Mikheytseva, Dr Sc (Biol), Senior Researcher and Head, Biochemistry Laboratory, SI “The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odesa (Ukraine)

N. I. Khramenko, SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»

Natalia I. Khramenko, Cand Sc (Med), Interim Head, Functional Diagnostics Department, SI “The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odesa (Ukraine)

S. G. Kolomiichuk, SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»

Sergii G. Kolomiichuk, Researcher, Biochemistry Laboratory, SI “The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odesa (Ukraine)

T. I. Siroshtanenko, SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»

Tetiana I. Siroshtanenko, Junior Researcher, Biochemistry Laboratory, SI “The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odesa (Ukraine)

Maiar Alobisi, SI «The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine»

Alobaisi Maiar, MD, SI “The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Odesa (Ukraine)

References

1. Chan JW, Chan NCY, Sadun AA. Glaucoma as Neurodegeneration in the Brain. Eye Brain. 2021;13:21-28. https://doi.org/10.2147/EB.S293765

2. Bou Ghanem GO, Wareham LK, Calkins DJ. Addressing neurodegeneration in glaucoma: Mechanisms, challenges, and treatments. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2024;100:101261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2024.101261

3. Nislawati R, Taufik Fadillah Zainal A, Ismail A, Waspodo N, Kasim F, Gunawan AMAK. Role of hypertension as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021;6(1):e000798. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000798

4. Mikheytseva IM. [Role of trigger endothelial, neuronal and integrative mechanisms in the development of glaucomatous process and new pathogenetic therapeutic approaches to primary glaucoma]. [Dissertation for the Degree of Dr Sc (Biol)]. Lugansk; 2013. Ukrainian.

5. Luo X, Shen YM, Jiang MN, Lou XF, Shen Y. Ocular Blood Flow Autoregulation Mechanisms and Methods. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:864871. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/864871

6. Zhang CJ, Jin ZB. Homeostasis and dyshomeostasis of the retina. Curr Med. 2023;2(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44194-023-00021-6

7. Alarcon-Martinez L, Shiga Y, Villafranca-Baughman D, Cueva Vargas JL, Vidal Paredes IA, Quintero H, et al. Neurovascular dysfunction in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2023;97:101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101217

8. Wang X, Wang M, Liu H, Mercieca K, Prinz J, Feng Y, et al. The Association between Vascular Abnormalities and Glaucoma - What Comes First? Intern J Mol Sciences.2023;24(17):13211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713211

9. Szewczuk A, Wawrzyniak ZM, Szaflik JP, Zaleska-Żmijewska A. Is Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma a Vascular Disease? Assessment of the Relationship between Retinal Arteriolar Morphology and Glaucoma Severity Using Adaptive Optics. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(2):478. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020478

10. Arrigo A, Aragona E, Saladino A, Arrigo D, Fantaguzzi F, Battaglia Parodi M, et al. Cognitive Dysfunctions in Glaucoma: An Overview of Morpho-Functional Mechanisms and the Impact on Higher-Order Visual Function. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:747050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.747050

11. Zhou W, Sabel BA. Vascular dysregulation in glaucoma: retinal vasoconstriction and normal neurovascular coupling in altitudinal visual field defects. EPMA J. 2023;14(1):87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-023-00316-6

12. Fernández-Albarral JA, Ramírez AI, de Hoz R, Matamoros JA, Salobrar-García E, Elvira-Hurtado L, et al. Glaucoma: from pathogenic mechanisms to retinal glial cell response to damage. Front Cell Neurosci.2024;18:1354569.https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2024.1354569

13. Holappa M, Vapaatalo Н, Vaajanen А. Many Faces of Renin-angiotensin System - Focus on Eye. Open Ophthalmol. J. 2017; 19(11):122-42. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101711010122

14. Donnarumma E, Ali MJ, Rushing АМ et al. Zofenopril Protects Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Increasing Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Bioavailability. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5. e003531.https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003531

15. Bucci M, Vellecco V, Cantalupo А. et al. Hydrogen sulfide accounts for the peripheral vascular effects of zofenopril independently of ACE inhibition. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014;102(1):138-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvu026

16. Mikheytseva I, Kolomiichuk S, Siroshtanenko T. The role of changes in the hydrogen sulfide level in eye tissues on the development of experimental glaucoma. Fiziol Zh. 2024; 70(6), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.15407/fz70.06.024

17. Mikheytseva IN. [Glaucoma models: advantages and shortcomings. Adrenaline-induced glaucoma as an adequate model of human glaucomatous process]. Oftalmol Zh. 2011;3:89-92. Russian.

18. Wagenmakers E, Kucharský Š, van Doorn J, van den Bergh D. Accessible and Sustainable Statistics with JASP. 2023.https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ud2vj

19. Wareham LK, Calkins DJ. The Neurovascular Unit in Glaucomatous Neurodegeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:452.https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00452

20. Feng Y, Prokosch V, Liu H. Current Perspective of Hydrogen Sulfide as a Novel Gaseous Modulator of Oxidative Stress in Glaucoma. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(5):671. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10050671

21. Salvi A, Bankhele Р, Jamil J et al. Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide Donors on Intraocular Pressure in Rabbits. 2016;32(6) :371-75. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2015.0144

22. Mikheytseva IN, Kolomiichuk SG, Siroshtanenko TI. Тherapy with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril as a new direction in the treatment of primary glaucoma. In: The Functioning of Healthcare in EU Countries and Ukraine in Maintaining Sustainable Development (March 19-20, 2025. Riga, the Republic of Latvia): International scientific conference. Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing:45-8. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-549-5-11

23. Kulkarni KH, Monjok EM, Zeyssig R at al. Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide on Sympathetic Neurotransmission and Catecholamine Levels in Isolated Porcine Iris-Ciliary Body. Neurochem. Res. 2009; 34: 400-06.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-008-9793-7

24. Shnayder NA, Petrova ММ, Popova ТЕ et al. Prospects for the personalized multimodal therapy approach to pain management via action on NO and NOS. Molecules. 2021;26(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092431

25. Wallace JL, Ferraz JG, Muscara MN. Hydrogen sulfide: an endogenous mediator of resolution of inflammation and injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012;17(1):58-67. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2011.4351

26. Tang G, Wu L, Liang W, Wang R. Direct stimulation of K(ATP) channels by exogenous and endogenous hydrogen sulfide in vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2005; 68(6):1757-64. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.105.017467

27. Terzuoli E, Monti М, Vellecco V et al. Characterization of zofenoprilat as an inducer of functional angiogenesis through increased H2S availability. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172(12):2961-73.https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13101

28. Cyr AR, Huckaby LV, Shiva SS, Zuckerbraun BS. Nitric Oxide and Endothelial Dysfunction. Crit Care Clin. 2020;36(2):307-321.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2019.12.009

29. Reina-Torres E, De Ieso ML, Pasquale LR, Madekurozwa M, van Batenburg-Sherwood J, Overby DR, et al. The vital role for nitric oxide in intraocular pressure homeostasis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;83:100922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100922

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

[1]
Mikheytseva, I.M. et al. 2025. Effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on ocular hydro- and hemodynamics in rabbits with experimental glaucoma. Ukrainian Journal of Ophthalmology . 6 (Dec. 2025), 42–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202564247.

Issue

Section

Experimental Studies

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.