Минимальная экспозиция распознавания тест-объектов у детей с различной рефракцией

V.I. Serdiuchenko; M.B. Zheliznik

doi:10.31288/oftalmolzh2016335

Authors

V.I. Serdiuchenko SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
M.B. Zheliznik SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh2016335

Keywords:

threshold exposure duration for recognition of test objects, refractive anomalies, emmetropia, hyperopia, myopia

Abstract

Backup: The speed of visual information processing is of primary importance today.

Purpose: To determine the threshold exposure duration for recognition of test objects (TEDRTO) values in children with various refractive statuses.

Materials and Methods: Seventy one children (22 hyperopes, 26 myopes, and 23 emmetropes; 142 eyes totally) aged 7 to 13 years underwent TEDRTO measurements with the electronic apparatus. A child fixated on a test object (TO) subtending 160, 40 or 8 minutes of arc (ma).

Results: The monocular TEDRTO values in emmetropes, hyperopes and myopes were 1.0 ms with a TO subtending 160 ma; 1.4±0.2 ms, 1.8±0.2 ms and 1.8±0.2 ms, respectively, with a TO subtending 40 ma; and 7.8±1.1 ms, 14.9±1.3 ms, and 7.9±1.0 ms, respectively, with a TO subtending 8 ma. Binocular TEDRTO values tended to be lower than monocular ones for optotypes subtending 40 and 8 ma.

Conclusion: TEDRTO values were found to increase significantly as the visual angle subtended by the TO decreased, which could be explained by a longer time required for recognition of a high-frequency image compared to that of a low-frequency image. Significantly higher TEDRTO values in hyperopes compared to emmetropes and myopes (P<0.05) might be explained by the involvement of accommodation in the mechanism of TO recognition in hyperopes.

References

Колбанов В. В. Исследование экспозиционной остроты зрения у членов экипажей бронетанковой техники // Воен.-мед. журн. - 1969. - № 7. - С. 72-73.

Колбанов В. В., Медведев В. И. Динамические характеристики зрительных функций // Физиология человека. - 1979. - Т. 5. - № 4. - С. 687-693.

Сердюченко В. И. Временные параметры разрешающей способности глаза и их значение для диагностики и лечения косоглазия и амблиопии // Офтальмол. журн. - 1994. - № 5. - С. 262-265.

Сердюченко В. И. Новые динамические методы исследования зрительных функций в клинике аномалий рефракции и нарушений бинокулярного зрения у детей. Дис. … доктора мед.наук. - Одесса, 1995. - 257 с.

Сердюченко В. И., Биберган М. А., Казимирский А. Б., Боханов В. Н. и др. Устройство для исследования остроты зрения. Пат. № 38162 на промышленный образец. СССР. № 61738. Заявл. 08.07.1991. Зарегистрировано в Гос. Реестре пром. O бразцов СССР 22.02.1993.

Baron W. S., Westheimer G. Visual acuity as a function of exposure duration // JOSA. - 1973. - V. 63. - N 2. - P. 212-219.https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.63.000212

Bokhov B. B., Nosovskii A. M. The impact of long term isolation on visual acuity // Aviacosm. Ecolog. Med. - 1997. - 31 (4). - P. 41-46. PMID: 9424196.

Cobb P. W. Some experiments on the speed of vision // Trans. Illum. Eng. Soc. - 1924. - V.19, N 2. - P. 150-175.

Dannenbaum E., Paquet N., Chilingaryan G., Fung J. Clinical evaluation of dynamic visual acuity in subject with unilateral vestibular hypofunction // Otol. Neurotol. - 2009, Apr. - 30 (3). - P 368-372. PMID: 19318888.https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bda35

Ferry C. a. Rand G. Intensity of light and speed of vision studied with the special reference to industrial situation // Trans. Illum. Eng. Soc. - 1928. - V. 23. - P. 827.

Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and architecture in the cat's visual cortex // J. Physiol. - 1962. - V.160. - P. 106-154.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837

Von Noorden Gunter K., Campos Emilio C. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. 6th ed. - 2002. - P. 115.