Positive and negative dysphotopsias in patients with the posterior chamber intraocular lens implanted after cataract surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202365965Keywords:
age-related cataract, crystalline lens, negative dysphotopsias, positive dysphotopsias, IOL, artiphakiaAbstract
Modern technologies of examining cataract patients and phacoemulsification with implantation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) commonly allow achieving the desired anatomical outcome and a high functional outcome after surgery. The development of postoperative dysphotopsias in patients with a posterior chamber IOL, however, requires a separate consideration. Dysphotopsia can develop practically in any eye with the IOL after cataract surgery and in some cases can affect postoperative vision, which hinders the patient from resuming working life as usual. Clear systemic guidelines for preventing postoperative dysphotopsia are still to be developed.
References
Dmytriiev SK, Grytsenko IA. [Phacoemulsification of age-related cataract in lenses of different densities]. [Section 8. Phacoemulsification complications in patients with dense cataract]. Odesa: Astroprint; 2022. p.142-70. Russian.
Qureshi MH, Steel DHW. Retinal detachment following cataract phacoemulsification - a review of the literature. Eye (Lond). 2020;34(4):616-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0575-z
Pilli S, Murjaneh S. Granulicatella adiacens endophthalmitis after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(12):e30-e34. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000355
Maedel S, Evans JR, Harrer-Seely A, Findl O. Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Review. 2021;8(8):CD012516. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012516.pub2
Yang Y, Zeng Z, Mu J, Fan W. Macular vascular density and visual function after phacoemulsification in cataract patients with non-pathological high myopia: a prospective observational cohort study. Graefe's Arc Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2022;260(8):2597-604. 2022 Aug;260(8):2597-2604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05606-9
Henderson BA, Yi DH, Constantine JB, Geneva II. New preventative approach for negative dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(10):1449-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.020
Häring G, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Weissmantel U, Kröncke W. Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. results of a multicenter questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(2):245-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00540-X
Jing Z, Hao J, Sun L, Zhao X, Jia X, Liu Z, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of corneal edema after phacoemulsification for diabetic cataract. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2023;69(4):164-71. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2023.69.4.26
Wang JD, Liu X, Zhang JS, Xiong Y, Li J, Li XX, et al. Effects and risks of 3.2-mm transparent corneal incision phacoemulsification for cataract after radial keratotomy. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(3):300060519895679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519895679
Farbowitz MA, Zabriskie NA, Crandall AS, Olson RJ, Miller KM. Visual complaints associated with the AcrySof acrylic intraocular lens(1). J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1339-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00441-7
Amos JF. Differential diagnosis of common etiologies of photopsia. J Am Optom Assoc. 1999;70(8):485-504.
Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1789-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00722-X
Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2449-2455.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.048
Davison JA. Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1346-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00611-8
Puell MC, Pérez-Carrasco MJ, Hurtado-Ceña FJ, Álvarez-Rementería L. Disk halo size measured in individuals with monofocal versus diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(11):2417-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.030
Alba-Bueno F, Vega F, Millán MS. [Halos and multifocal intraocular lenses: origin and interpretation]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2014;89(10):397-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2014.01.002
Jeon S, Choi A, Kwon H. Analysis of uncorrected near visual acuity after extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity™ intraocular lens implantation. PloS one. 2022;17(11):e0277687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277687
Moser Wurth CL, Lecumberri Lopez M. Visual performance of a new Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) intraocular lens: Preliminary results. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022;45(5):529-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.10.007
Stephenson M. Dysphotopsia: not just black and white. Rev Ophthalmol. 2017;24(11):52-65.
Erie JC, Bandhauer MH, McLaren JW. Analysis of postoperative glare and intraocular lens design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):614-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00781-1
Holladay JT, Simpson MJ. Negative dysphotopsia: Causes and rationale for prevention and treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(2):263-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.049
Holladay JT, Zhao H, Reisin CR. Negative dysphotopsia: the enigmatic penumbra. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(7):1251-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.032
Cooke DL. Negative dysphotopsia after temporal corneal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(4):671-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.004
Osher RH. Negative dysphotopsia: long-term study and possible explanation for transient symptoms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(10):1699-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.026
Mamalis N. Negative dysphotopsia following cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(3):371-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.001
Masket S, Fram NR. Pseudophakic negative dysphotopsia: Surgical management and new theory of etiology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(7):1199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.02.022
Vámosi P, Csákány B, Németh J. Intraocular lens exchange in patients with negative dysphotopsia symptoms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(3):418-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.035
Makhotkina NY, Dugrain V, Purchase D, Berendschot TTJM, Nuijts RMMA. Effect of supplementary implantation of a sulcus-fixated intraocular lens in patients with negative dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(2):209-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.013
Masket S, Fram NR. Pseudophakic Dysphotopsia: Review of Incidence, Cause, and Treatment of Positive and Negative Dysphotopsia. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):e195-e205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.009
Makhotkina NY, Berendschot TT, Nuijts RM. Objective evaluation of negative dysphotopsia with Goldmann kinetic perimetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(11):1626-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.09.016
Masket S, Rupnik Z, Fram NR. Neuroadaptive changes in negative dysphotopsia during contralateral eye occlusion. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):242-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.010
Masket S, Rupnik MZ, Fram NR, et al. Binocular Goldmann Visual Field Testing of Negative Dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):147-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000001
Rupnik Z, Elekes Á, Vámosi P. Clinical experience with an anti-dysphotopic intraocular lens. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(2):183-8. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_191_21.
Masket S, Fram NR, Cho A, Park I, Pham D. Surgical management of negative dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jan;44(1):6-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.038
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dmytriev S.K., Bryn M.V.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.
