Maxillary postimplantation syndrome: ocular aspects

Authors

  • A.O. Asmolova Odesa National Medical University; Odessa (Ukraine)
  • O.V. Pasechnik Odesa National Medical University; Odessa (Ukraine)
  • O.V. Zborovska SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • O.E. Dorokhova SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201864043

Keywords:

dental implant placement, maxillary postimplantation syndrome, uveitis, dacryocystitis, optic nerve drusen

Abstract

Background: Maxillary postimplantation syndrome (MPS) has been previously described as a complication occurring more than 1 year after maxillary implant placement in patients with partial loss of teeth due to accident, extraction and/or local periodontal disease. The syndrome is characterized by dental, rhinological, ocular and/or neurodental symptoms.

Purpose: To determine frequencies of ocular disorders in patients who developed manifestations of maxillary postimplantation syndrome.

Materials and Methods: Seventy four patients with MPS (age, 27 to 64 years) and 43 healthy volunteers (age, 25 to 63 years) were involved in the diagnostic study. Patients underwent a routine clinical examination including rhinoscopy, stomatoscopy, and paranasal sinus computed tomography. In addition, a routine eye examination was performed.

Results: Ocular disorders were found in 81% of patients with MPS, and included functional injury of the nasolacrimal canal (51%), dacryocystitis (20.2%), and intermediate uveitis (6.7%) with complications manifesting as macular edema or epiretinal membrane (4.05%), optic nerve drusen (6.7%), and optic neuritis (5.4%). Some MPS patients exhibited several ocular disorders (including, in particular, a functional injury of the nasolacrimal canal or dacryocystitis).

Conclusion: Ocular disorders were found in 81% of patients with MPS. Patients with MPS should undergo an eye examination even in the absence of ocular complaints.

References

1.Asmolova AA. [Maxillary postimplantation syndrome: abnormal variant anatomy of the paranasal sinuses]. Luchevaia diagnostika, luchevaia terapiia. 2015; 3-4:47-53. Russian.

2.Asmolova AA. [Maxillary postimplantation syndrome: clinical observations]. Luchevaia diagnostika, luchevaia terapiia. 2018; 1:78-81. Russian.

3.Asmolova AA. [Maxillary postimplantation syndrome: status of carotid arteries]. Luchevaia diagnostika, luchevaia terapiia. 2016; 1:22-7. Russian.

4.Asmolova AA. [Status of oral fluid in maxillary postimplantation syndrome]. Innovatsii v stomatologii. 2017; 1:11-4. Russian.

5.Аsmolova AА. Dental implants can generate maxillary postimplantation syndrome. Arta Medica. 1(54):28-30.

6.Lapach SN, Chubenko AV, Babych PN. [Statistical methods in biomedical research using Excel]. 2nd ed. Kyiv: Morion; 2001. Ukrainian.

7.Sheremet NL. [Diagnostics of optical neuropathies of different origin]. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Medical Science. Moscow: Research Institute for Eye Disease; 2015. Russian.

8.Chang MY, Pineles SL. Optic disc drusen in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov - Dec;61(6):745-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.03.007

9.Fotzsch R. Problems in the etiology, pathogenesis and clinical significance of drusen (hyalin bodies) of the optic disk. Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1970 Jun;22(6):223-7.

Published

2026-02-06

How to Cite

[1]
Asmolova, A. et al. 2026. Maxillary postimplantation syndrome: ocular aspects. Ukrainian Journal of Ophthalmology . 6 (Feb. 2026), 40–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201864043.

Issue

Section

Clinical Ophthalmology

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.