Comparing bioelectrical activity of the central retina among myopic patients operated for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by choroidal detachment

Authors

  • Alibet Yassine SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • V.S. Ponomarchuk SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • N.I. Khramenko SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • G.V. Levytska SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201841725

Keywords:

rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, choroidal detachment, electroretinography

Abstract

Background: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a serious incapacitating disease requiring surgical treatment. Trophic disturbances in the central and peripheral retina are characteristic for myopia, which is known to be a major risk factor for RRD.

Purpose: 1) To investigate the bioelectrical activity of the central retina after successful surgery for combined RRD and CD in patients differing in the degree of myopia, and 2) to compare the characteristics with those of normal eyes and myopic patients successfully operated for uncomplicated RRD.

Materials and Methods: Fifty two patients (52 eyes) were included into the study 3 months after undergoing a single successful vitrectomy with gas tamponade, either for uncomplicated RRD (32 eyes), or combined RRD and CD  (20 eyes). They were divided into four groups: Groups 1 and 2 (moderate and high myopes after surgery for uncomplicated RRD; 21 and 11 patients, respectively), and Groups 3 and 4 (moderate and high myopes after surgery for combined RRD and CD; 9 and 11 patients, respectively). Fourteen age-matched individuals (28 eyes) without any ocular or systemic disease were enrolled as controls (Group 5). Photopic cone response and photopic 30 Hz flicker cone response were recorded to examine the bioelectrical activity of the central retina.

Results: A-wave and b-wave implicit times of the photopic cone response (a) reflect conductance related to the photoreceptor and inner layers, respectively, of the central retina, and (b) were 25% longer and 28% longer, respectively, for myopic eyes after surgery for either uncomplicated RRD or combined RRD and CD, than for normal eyes. A-wave amplitude of the photopic cone response (a) reflects the summed bioelectrical activity of retinal photoreceptor cones, and (b) in moderately or highly myopic eyes after surgery for uncomplicated RRD was 1.9-fold and 3.5-fold lower, respectively, and in moderately or highly myopic eyes after surgery for combined RRD and CD, 3.9-fold and 6.6-fold lower, respectively, than in normal eyes. B-wave amplitude of the photopic cone response (a) reflects the summed bioelectrical activity of the retinal inner layers, and (b) in moderately or highly myopic eyes after surgery for uncomplicated RRD was 1.6-fold and 2.8-fold lower, respectively, whereas in those after surgery for combined RRD and CD, 3.8-fold lower, than in normal eyes. Amplitude of photopic 30 Hz flicker cone response (a) reflects the bioelectrical activity of cones, and (b) in moderately myopic eyes after surgery for uncomplicated RRD was 1.6-fold lower, whereas in myopic eyes after surgery for combined RRD and CD, 2.8-fold lower, than in normal eyes. We found direct correlations between BCVA and b-wave and a-wave amplitudes of the photopic cone response (r = 0.61 and r = 0.54, respectively), and amplitude of the 30 Hz flicker response (r = 0.53), and an inverse correlation (r=-0.53) between BCVA and a-wave implicit time of the photopic cone response for myopic eyes after surgery for either uncomplicated RRD or combined RRD and CD.

Conclusion: Bioelectrical activity of the central retina was found to be more decreased in highly myopic eyes after surgery for  combined RRD and CD than in other myopic eyes of the study.

References

Jarrett WH. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by severe intraocular inflammation, hypotony, and choroidal detachment. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1981;79:664-83

de Smedt S., Sullivan P. Massive choroidal detachment masking overlying primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a case series. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2001;(282):51-5.

Alibet Y, Levytska G, Umanets N, Pasyechnikova NV, Henrich B. Ciliary body thickness changes after preoperative anti-inflammatory treatment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by choroidal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1503-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3673-2

Alibet Y, Zadorozhnyy OS, Levytska GV, Pasyechnikova NV. [Visualization of ciliary body structures after preoperative anti-inflammatory treatment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by choroidal detachment]. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018; 1(480):54-9. Russian

Mitry D, Charteris DG, Yorson D, et al.; Scottish RD Study Group: The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment in Scotland: a two-year prospective population-based study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Oct;51(10):4963-8.https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5400

Park JL, Kim SD, Yun IH. A clinical study of the rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec;15(2):118-27 https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2001.15.2.118

Park HJ, Lee SW, Kim KH, Lee JH, Lee JE, Oum BS. An Analysis of Metamorphopsia Using Preferential Hyperacuity Perimeter Following Macular-off RRD Surgical Repair. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51(4):552-7. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2010.51.4.552

Fisher SK, Lewis GP, Linberg KA, Verardo MR. Cellular remodeling in mammalian retina: results from studies of experimental retinal detachment. Prog Retin Eye Res. 24:395-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.10.004

Sakai T, Tsuneoka H, Lewis GP, Fisher SK. Remodelling of retinal on- and off-bipolar cells following experimental retinal detachment. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 42:480-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12246

Electroretinographic studies in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment before and after reattachment surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;15(2):118-27 https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2001.15.2.118

Barliya T, Ofri R, Sandalon S, Weinberger D, Livnat T. Changes in Ret-inal Function and Cellular Remodeling Following Experimental Retinal Detachment in a Rabbit Model.. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:4046597. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4046597

Safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of recombinant erythropoietin for protection of photoreceptor cells in a rat model of retinal detachment. Eye (Lond). 2012 Jan; 26(1): 144-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.254

Alibet Y, Ponomarchuk VS, Levytska GV, Khramenko NI. [Comparing bioelectrical activity of the peripheral retina among myopic patients operated for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by choroidal detachment]. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018; 3:45-51. Russian

Atlas of testing and clinical application for Roland Electrophysiological Instrument. Beijing Science and Technology Press. 2006. pp.5-19.

Published

2026-01-14

How to Cite

[1]
Alibet Yassine et al. 2026. Comparing bioelectrical activity of the central retina among myopic patients operated for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated by choroidal detachment. Ukrainian Journal of Ophthalmology . 4 (Jan. 2026), 17–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201841725.

Issue

Section

Clinical Ophthalmology

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.