Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.202611420Keywords:
ICL exchange, lens removal, implantable collamer lens, keratoconus , corneaAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the indications, timing, and clinical outcomes of phakic implantable collamer lens (ICL) exchange or explantation between eyes with keratoconus and eyes without keratoconus or other corneal ectasia (non-ectatic eyes), and to evaluate factors associated with the need for secondary ICL intervention, at a tertiary eye hospital in Iraq.
Methods: This retrospective record review included ICL (V4b) procedures performed between January 2022 and January 2024. Among 200 implanted eyes, 25 eyes (12.5%) underwent secondary surgery and were included for group comparison: keratoconus group (n=10) and non-ectatic group (n=15). Clinical data included visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density, corneal parameters, and vault. Comparative analyses were performed between groups, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: In the keratoconus group, ICL exchange occurred in 5/10 (50.0%) and explantation in 5/10 (50.0%); in the non-ectatic group, exchange occurred in 8/15 (53.3%) and explantation in 7/15 (46.7%). The primary indications for exchange/explantation differed between groups. In keratoconus eyes, indications were vault-related issues (7/10; 70.0%), residual refractive concerns (2/10; 20.0%), and patient dissatisfaction (1/10; 10.0%). In non-ectatic eyes, indications were vault-related issues (9/15; 60.0%), cataract (2/15; 13.3%), elevated intraocular pressure (2/15; 13.3%), refractive concerns (1/15; 6.7%), and patient dissatisfaction (1/15; 6.7%).
Conclusion: ICL exchange or explantation occurred in 12.5% of implanted eyes in this cohort. Vault-related indications were the most common reason for secondary intervention in both groups, while cataract and elevated intraocular pressure were observed only in the non-ectatic group. These findings support careful sizing/vault assessment and structured follow-up in eyes undergoing ICL implantation.
References
1. Chen X, Li L, Rao J, Chen YX, Gao Y, et al. Long-term observation on safety and visual quality of implantable collamer lens V4c implantation for myopia correction: a 5-year follow-up. Int J Ophthalmol. 2023;16(7):1123-9. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.07.18
2. AlSabaani NA, Behrens A, Jastanieah S, Al Malki S, Al Jindan M, et al. Causes of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens Explantation/Exchange at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016;23(4):293-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.194076
3. Lalgudi VG, Shetty R, Nischal KK, Ziai S, Koaik M, et al. Biochemical and molecular alterations and potential clinical applications of biomarkers in keratoconus. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.4103/SJOPT.SJOPT_203_21
4. Emerah SH, Sabry MM, Saad HA, Ghobashy WA. Visual and refractive outcomes of posterior chamber phakic IOL in stable keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(5):840-3. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.05.22
5. Abdelmassih Y, El-Khoury S, Chelala E, Slim E, Cherfan CG, et al. Toric ICL Implantation After Sequential Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation and Corneal Cross-linking in Keratoconus: 2-Year Follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):610-6. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170621-02
6. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Kobashi H, Igarashi A, Komatsu M, et al. Three-year follow-up of posterior chamber toric phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of high myopic astigmatism in eyes with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(2):177-83. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305612
7. Zhang X, Tao XC, Li ZW, Zhou WY, Ma P, et al. Combining corneal crosslinking and phakic toric Implantable Collamer Lenses for the treatment of keratectasia: A case report. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(3):1495-8. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3481
8. Zhu AY, Jun AS, Soiberman US. Combined Protocols for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Photorefractive Surgery for Refractive Management of Keratoconus: Update on Techniques and Review of Literature. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(Suppl 1):15-31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-00210-3
9. Chaitanya SR, Anitha V, Ravindran M, Ghorpade A, Rengappa R, et al. Safety and efficacy of toric implantable collamer lens V4c model - A retrospective South Indian study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):3006-11. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1492_20
10. Alhamzah A, Alharbi SS, Alfardan F, Aldebasi T, Almudhaiyan T. Indications for exchange or explantation of phakic implantable collamer lens with central port in patients with and without keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(11):1714-20. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.11.10
11. Trancón AS, Manito SC, Sierra OT, Baptista AM, Serra PM. Determining vault size in implantable collamer lenses: preoperative anatomy and lens parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(5):728-36.https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000146
12. Gimbel HV, LeClair BM, Jabo B, Marzouk H. Incidence of implantable Collamer lens-induced cataract. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(5):518-22.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.018
13. Chang JS, Meau AY. Visian Collamer phakic intraocular lens in high myopic Asian eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(1):17-25.https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20070101-05
14. Sánchez-González JM, Alonso-Aliste F, Perea-Peña G, Rachwani-Anil R, Márquez-de-Aracena-Del-Cid R, et al. Anterior chamber angle width, central vault and intraocular pressure changes after 12 months of Visian collamer lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(8):2047-53.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01381-w
15. Fairaq R, Almutlak M, Almazyad E, Badawi AH, Ahad MA. Outcomes and complications of implantable collamer lens for mild to advance keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(7):2609-18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01820-2
16. Liu TX, Luo X. Stability of axis and patient satisfaction after toric implantable collamer lens implantation for myopic astigmatism. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(6):1371-4.https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.296.3986
17. Dougherty PJ, Priver T. Refractive outcomes and safety of the implantable collamer lens in young low-to-moderate myopes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:273-7.https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120427
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Imad Hussein Sachit, Muataz Hasan Jaaz, Ammar Adil Fahad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.
