Modern aspects of using of ultrasonic energy in cataract and vitreoretinal surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202136165Ключові слова:
ultrasound, phacoemulsification, ultrasonic aspiration of cortex, ultrasonic vitrectomy, vitreoretinal surgeryАнотація
The review demonstrates current data on the nature of ultrasound, its effect on biological structures and the possibilities of using ultrasound for the diagnosis, conservative and surgical treatment of eye diseases. The article contains descriptions of technologies of cataract surgery using ultrasonic energy, as well as new possibilities of using ultrasound not only to remove the nucleus, but also to remove the cortex of the lens, and modern applications of the energy of ultrasound in vitreoretinal surgery.
Посилання
1.Akopyan BV, Ershov YuA. The basics of the interaction of ultrasound with biological objects: Ultrasound in medicine, veterinary medicine and experimental biology. Moscow: Izd. MGTU im NE Baumana; 2005. 224 p. In Russian.
2.Fridman FE, Gundorova RA, Kodzov MB. Ultrasound in ophthalmology. Moscow: Medicine; 1989. 256 p. In Russian.
3.Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Schmidt FL. Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic wound healing: a meta-analysis. Wound Repair Regen. 1999; 7 (6): 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00495.x
4.Dalecki D, Raeman CH, Child SZ, Cox C, Francis CW, Meltzer RS, et al. Hemolysis in vivo from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997; 23 (2): 307-313.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(96)00203-7
5.Carovac A, Smajlovic F, Junuzovic D. Application of Ultrasound in Medicine. Acta Inform Med. 2011; 19(3): 168-171.https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2011.19.168-171
6.Ranganayakulu SV, Rao NR, Gahane L. Ultrasound applications in Medical Sciences. IJMTER. 2016; 03 (02): 287-293.
7.Mundt GH, Hughes WE. Ultrasonics in ocular diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1956; 41 (3): 488-498.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(56)91262-4
8.Oksala A, Lehtinen A. Diagnostic value of ultrasonics in ophthalmology. Ophthalmologica. 1957; 134 (3): 387-395.https://doi.org/10.1159/000303246
9.Marmur RK. Ultrasonic therapy and diagnosis of eye diseases. Kiev: Zdorovya; 1974. 166 p. In Russian.
10.Baum G, Greenwood I. The application of ultrasonic locating techniques to ophthalmology: theoretic considerations and acoustic properties of ocular media: Part 1. Reflective properties. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958; 46 (5): 319-329.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(58)90813-4
11.Ossoinig KC. Standardized echography: basic principles, clinical applications and results. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1979; 19 (4): 127-210.https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-197901940-00007
12.Bronson NR, Turner FT. A simple B scan ultrasonoscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973; 90 (3): 237-238.https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1973.01000050239012
13.Aburn NS, Sergott RC. Orbital colour Doppler imaging. Eye. 1993; 7: 639-647.https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1993.147
14.Guthoff R, Berger RW, Winkler Р. Doppler ultrasonography of the ophthalmic and central retinal vessels. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109 (4): 532-536.https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1991.01080040100037
15.Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, Foster FS. Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98 (3): 287-295.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32298-X
16.Kiseleva TN, Zaitsev MS, Lugovkina KV. The Safety of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018; 15 (4): 447-454. In Russian.https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-4-447-454
17.Kelman CD. Phaco emulsification and aspiration. A new technique of cataract removal. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967; 64 (1): 23-35.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(67)93340-5
18.Kelman CD. Phaco-emulsification and aspiration: A progress report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969; 67(4): 464-477.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(69)94252-4
19.Cimino WW, Bond LJ. Physics of ultrasonic surgery using tissue fragmentation: part I. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996; 22 (1): 89-100.https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(95)02021-7
20.Pacifico R. Ultrasonic energy in phacoemulsification: Mechanical cutting and cavitation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994; 20 (3): 338-341.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80587-1
21.Packer M, Fishkind WJ, Fine IH, Seibel BS. The physics of phaco: A review. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 31 (2): P. 424-431.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.11.027
22.Gupta I, Cahoon JM, Gardiner G, Garff K, Henriksen BS, Pettey JH, et al. Effect of increased vacuum and aspiration rates on phacoemulsification efficiency. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41 (4): 836-841.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.035
23.Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22 (8): 1079-1084.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80121-0
24.Beesley RD, Olson RJ, Brady SE. The effects of prolonged phacoemulsification time on the corneal epithelium. Ann. Ophthalmol. 1986; 18 (6): 216-219, 222.
25.Sippel KC, Pineda R. Phacoemulsification and thermal wound injury. Semin Ophthalmol. 2002; 17: 102-109.https://doi.org/10.1076/soph.17.3.102.14776
26.Holst A, Rolfsen W, Svensson B, Ollinger K, Lundgren B. Formation of free radicals during phacoemulsification. Curr Eye Res. 1993; 12 (4): 359-365.https://doi.org/10.3109/02713689308999460
27.Cameron MD, Poyer JF, Aust SD. Identification of free radicals produced during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27 (3): 463-470.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00643-X
28.Topaz M, Shuster V, Assia EI, Meyerstein D, Meyerstein N, Mazor D, et al. Acoustic cavitation in phacoemulsification and the role of antioxidants. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31 (8): 1123-1129.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.02.016
29.Yow L, Batsi S. Physical and mechanical principles of phacoemulsification and their clinical relevance. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997; 45: (4): 241-249.
30.Davison JA. Bimodal capsular bag phacoemulsification: A serial cutting and suction ultrasonic nuclear dissection technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989; 15 (3): 272-282.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(89)80084-7
31.Gimbell HV. Divide and conquer nucleofractis phacoemulsification: development and variations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991; 17 (3): 281-291.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80824-3
32.Badoza D, Mendy JF. Phacoemulsification using the burst mode. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29 (6): 1101-1105.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00074-9
33.Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Packer M. New phacoemulsification technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28 (6): 1054-1060.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01399-8
34.Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Packer M. Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: Improved outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30 (5): 1014-1019.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.09.062
35.Alio JL, Fine IH. Minimizing incisions maximizing outcomes in cataract surgery. NY: Springer; 2010. 319 p.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02862-5
36.Seibel BS. Phacodynamics: Mastering the Tools and Techniques of Phacoemulsification Surgery. Fourth Edition. NY: SLACK Inc; 2004. 400 p.
37.Aznabaev BM, Ramazanov VN, Mukhamadeev TR. New phacoemulsification ultrasound power modulation and experimental estimation of its efficiency. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya i oftal'mologiya. 2006; 6(1): 30-37. In Russian.
38.Aznabaev BM, Noskov VM, Ramazanov VN, Rakhimov AF, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR. Ultrasonic instrument of phacoemulsifier with three-dimensional vibrations: patent RF, № 2603718 C2; 2016. In Russian.
39.Temirov N.E. Hydromonitor phacofragmentation and vitrectomy. Theoretical, experimental, clinical substantiation. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 1982; (2): 20-25. In Russian.
40.Mackool RJ, Brint SF. AquaLase: a new technology for cataract extraction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15: 40-43.https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200402000-00008
41.Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M, Brown LK. Comparison of sonic and ultrasonic phacoemulsification using Staar Sonic Wave system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28 (9): 1581-1584.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01324-4
42.Kopaev SYu. Clinical and experimental justification for the combined use of neodymium YAG 1.44 μm and helium-neon 0.63 μm lasers in cataract surgery [dissertation]. [Moscow]. The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution. 2014; 338 p. In Russian.
43.Kopaeva VG, Andreev YuV. Laser cataract extraction. М.: Oftal'mologiya; 2011. 262 p. In Russian.
44.Dalton M. Laser-assisted cataract surgery: Bringing new technologies into the fold. EyeWorld, 2011. [cited 2020 Sep 4]; Available from: http://www.eyeworld.org/article-bringing-new-technologies-into-the-fold
45.Kostenev SV. Femtosecond laser technology - a development vector - cataract surgery. Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologii. 2012; 12(3): 112-114. In Russian.
46.Mendez A, Manriquez AO. Comparison of Effective Phacoemulsification and Pulsed Vacuum Time for Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery. ASCRS Cornea Congress. San Diego, 2015. [cited 2020 Sep 4]; Available from: https://ascrs.confex.com/ascrs/15am/webprogram/Paper18055.html
47.Buratto L, Werner L. Zanini M, Apple DJ. Phacoemulsification: Principles and Techniques, Second Edition. SLACK Inc; 2003. 768 p.
48.Federal clinical guidelines for the provision of eye care for patients with age-related cataracts. Expert Council on the problem of cataract surgical treatment. Interregional Association of Ophthalmologist. Moscow: Ophthalmology; 2015. 32 p. In Russian.
49.Aznabaev BM, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR, Idrisova GM. Clinical performance of system for ultrasonic cortex aspiration during phacoemulsification. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2018; 14 (4): 811-815. In Russian.
50.Aznabaev BM, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR, Idrisova GM. Corneal microarchitectonics in phacoemulsification using a system for ultrasonic cortex aspiration. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal'mologii. 2019; 5 (30): 9-13. In Russian.https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2019-5-9-13
51.Idrisova GM. Thermal safety of a system for ultrasonic aspiration of lens cortex. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2018; 14 (4): 919-922. In Russian.
52.Girard LJ, Rodriguez J, Mailman ML, Romano TJ. Cataract and Uveitis management by pars plana lensectomy and vitrectomy by ultrasonic fragmentation. Retina. 1985; 5 (2): 108-114.https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-198500520-00009
53.Kossovsky LV, Stolyarenko GE, Kossovskaya IL. Application of the domestic ultrasonic phakofragmentator in eye surgery (communication 2). The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 1983; (3): 29-33. In Russian.
54.Bopp S, El-Hifnaw E, Bornfeld N, Laqua H. Retinal lesion experimentally produced by intravitreal ultrasound. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993; 231: 295-302.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919108
55.Machemer R. A new concept for vitreous surgery. Surgical technique and complication. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972; 74 (6): 1022-1033.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(72)90719-2
56.Aznabaev BM, Shirshov MV, Mukhamadeev TR, Ramazanov VN, Yamlikhanov AG, Dibaev TI. New algorithm of vitrectomy system control. Kataraktalnaya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2013; 13 (2): 37-40. In Russian.
57.Aznabaev BM, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR, Vafiev AS, Shavaliev IKh. Ultrasonic vitrectomy: performance evaluation in experimental and clinical conditions. Practical Medicine. 2018; 16 (4): 56-60. In Russian.https://doi.org/10.32000/2072-1757-2018-16-4-56-60
58.Saxena S, Meyer CH, Ohji M, Akduman L. Vitreoretinal surgery. Jp Medical; 2012. 442 p.https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11557
59.Stanga PE, Pastor-Idoate S, Zambrano I, Carlin P, McLeod D. Performance analysis of a new hypersonic vitrector system. PLos One. 2017; 12 (6): e0178462.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178462
60.Pastor-Idoate S, Bonshek R, Irion L, Zambrano I, Carlin P, Mironov A, et al. Ultrastructural and histopathologic findings after pars plana vitrectomy with a new hypersonic vitrector system. Qualitative preliminary report. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4): e0173883.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173883
61.Wuchinich D. Ultrasonic vitrectomy instrument. Physics Procedia. 2015; 63: 217-222.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.03.035
62.Aznabaev BM, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR, Vafiev AS, Shavaliev IKh. Twenty-five gauge ultrasonic vitrectomy. Experimental and Clinical Performance Analysis. Retina. 2020; 40 (7): 1443-1450.https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002863
63.Pavlidis M. Two-Dimensional Cutting (TDC) Vitrectome: In Vitro Flow Assessment and Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating Core Vitrectomy Efficiency versus Standard Vitrectome. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016: 3849316.https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3849316
64.Abulon DJ, Buboltz DC. Porcine Vitreous Flow Behavior During High-Speed Vitrectomy up to 7500 Cuts per Minute. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016; 5(1): 7.https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.1.7
65.Hubschman JP, Bourges JL, Tsui I, Reddy S, Yu F, Schwartz SD. Effect of cutting phases on flow rate in 20-, 23- and 25-gauge vitreous cutters. Retina. 2009; 29(9): 1289-1293.https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181acd3a9
66.Aznabaev BM, Dibaev TI, Mukhamadeev TR, Vafiev AS, Shavaliev IKh. Thermal imaging characteristics of ultrasonic and pneumatic guillotine 25-gauge vitrectors. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2018; 14 (4): 916-919. In Russian.
##submission.downloads##
Опубліковано
Як цитувати
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2025 B. M. Aznabaev, T. I. Dibaev, T. R. Mukhamadeev, A. S. Vafiev, G. M. Idrisova
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY). Ця ліцензія дозволяє повторно використовувати, поширювати, переробляти, адаптувати та будувати на основі матеріалу на будь-якому носії або в будь-якому форматі за умови обов'язкового посилання на авторів робіт і первинну публікацію у цьому журналі. Ліцензія дозволяє комерційне використання.
ПОЛОЖЕННЯ ПРО АВТОРСЬКІ ПРАВА
Автори, які подають матеріали до цього журналу, погоджуються з наступними положеннями:
- Автори отримують право на авторство своєї роботи одразу після її публікації та назавжди зберігають це право за собою без жодних обмежень.
- Дата початку дії авторського права на статтю відповідає даті публікації випуску, до якого вона включена.
ПОЛІТИКА ДЕПОНУВАННЯ
- Редакція журналу заохочує розміщення авторами рукопису статті в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах), оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності і динаміці цитування.
- Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження статті у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом за умови збереження посилання на первинну публікацію у цьому журналі.
- Дозволяється самоархівування постпринтів (версій рукописів, схвалених до друку в процесі рецензування) під час їх редакційного опрацювання або опублікованих видавцем PDF-версій.
- Самоархівування препринтів (версій рукописів до рецензування) не дозволяється.
