Impact of preservative-free vs preserved latanoprost 0.005% on the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma

Authors

  • T. Zhmud National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-8674
  • S. Barabino Ocular Surface and Dry Eye Center, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Ospedlae L.Sacco-Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • G. Drozhzhyna The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and tissue therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.20263411

Keywords:

ocular surface damage, dry eye disease, impression cytology, latanoprost, glaucoma

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the state of the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) when using latanoprost 0.005% eye drops with and without preservatives.
Methods: Thirty-six patients with POAG were divided into two study groups. Study group 1 included 21 patients (21 eyes) who used benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost 0.005% eye drops, and study group 2, 15 patients (15 eyes) who used preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% in the Protriaxin matrix. Twenty-one healthy participants comprised the control group.
Results: We found that use of anti-glaucoma medication without or with a preservative does not affect the cytological landscape of the bulbar conjunctiva. However, we observed the presence of inflammatory cells in 42.8% of patients taking BAK-preserved latanoprost and in 6.6% of patients taking the preservative-free medication (p=0.0279). Patients in study group 1 had 10.5 times the odds of presence of inflammatory cells than those in study group 2 (OR= 10.5; 95% CI [1.15 -95.25], P=0.0366).
Conclusion: These findings support the preferential use of preservative-free antiglaucoma eye drops, particularly in patients with pre-existing or suspected ocular surface damage, to minimize cytological changes and subclinical inflammation during long-term therapy.

Author Biographies

T. Zhmud, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine

Dr. Tetiana Zhmud, M.D, Doctor of Medical Science (Ophthalmology), Department of Ophthalmology, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine

G. Drozhzhyna, The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and tissue therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine

Galyna Drozhzhyna, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Corneal Pathology Department, The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and tissue therapy of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine

References

Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology.2014;121(11):2081-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

Prajwal PM, Gopalakrishna HN, Kateel R. An exploratory study on the drug utilization pattern in glaucoma patients at a tertiary care hospital. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2013;3(4):151-155.https://doi.org/10.7897/2230-8407.04840

Charnock C. Are multidose over-the-counter artificial tears adequately preserved? Cornea. 2006;25(4):432-437. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000183538.53017.69

Chen W, Zhang Z, Hu J, et al. Changes in rabbit corneal innervation induced by the topical application of benzalkonium chloride. Cornea. 2013;32(12):1599-1606. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318299549c

Martone G, Frezzotti P, Tosi GM, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy analysis of effects of topical antiglaucoma therapy with preservative on corneal innervation and morphology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(4):725-735.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.019

Noecker RJ, Herrygers LA, Anwaruddin R. Corneal and conjunctival changes caused by commonly used glaucoma medications. Cornea. 2004;23(5):490-496. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000116526.57227.82

Giménez-Gómez R, García-Catalán MR, Gallardo-Galera JM. Tear clearance and ocular symptoms in patients treated with preservative-free prostaglandins. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2013;88(3):88-91.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2012.06.003

Gandolfi S, Paredes T, Goldberg I, et al. Comparison of a travoprost BAK-free formulation preserved with polyquaternium-1 with BAK-preserved travoprost in ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(1):34-44. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000001

Harasymowycz P, Hutnik C, Rouland JF, et al. Preserved versus preservative-free latanoprost for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a post hoc pooled analysis. Adv Ther. 2021;38(6):3019-3031.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01731-9

Tetiana Zhmud, Malachkova NV, Drozhzhyna GI. A method for performing conjunctival impression cytology in dry eye associated with type 2 diabetes. Ukraine Patent No. 111941. 2022 Feb 21.

John D. Nelson. Dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(6):426. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.81.6.426

Tetiana Zhmud, Drozhzhyna GI, Demchuk AV. Cytological features of the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Ophthalmol (Ukraine). 2021;(1):34-38.

Abegão Pinto L, Vandewalle E, Gerlier L, Stalmans I. Improvement in glaucoma patient quality of life by therapy switch to preservative-free timolol/dorzolamide fixed combination. Ophthalmologica. 2014;231(3):166-171. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357674

Crichton AC, Vold S, Williams JM, Hollander DA. Ocular surface tolerability of prostaglandin analogs and prostamides in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Adv Ther. 2013;30(3):260-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-013-0014-7

Rahmatnejad K, Rapuano CJ, Ichhpujani P, et al. The effects of latanoprost with benzalkonium chloride versus travoprost with sofzia on the ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43(5):308-312.https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000294

Jaenen N, Baudouin C, Pouliquen P, Manni G, Figueiredo A, Zeyen T. Ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative-free glaucoma medications. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(3):341-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700307

Pisella PJ, Pouliquen P, Baudouin C. Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative-free glaucoma medication. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(4):418-423. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.4.418

Faridi UA, Saleh TA, Ewings P, et al. Comparative study of three prostaglandin analogues in the treatment of newly diagnosed cases of ocular hypertension, open-angle and normal tension glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(7):678-682.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02326.x

Mishra D, Sinha BP, Kumar MS. Comparing the efficacy of latanoprost (0.005%), bimatoprost (0.03%), travoprost (0.004%), and timolol (0.5%) in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014;28(5):399-407.https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.5.399

Lee SS, Robinson MR, Weinreb RN. Episcleral venous pressure and the ocular hypotensive effects of topical and intracameral prostaglandin analogs. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(9):846-857. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001329

Li F, Huang W, Zhang X. Efficacy and safety of different regimens for primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3):e277-e284. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13642

Sakata R, Sakisaka T, Matsuo H, Miyata K, Aihara M. Time course of prostaglandin analog-related conjunctival hyperemia and the effect of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ophthalmic solution. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(3):e204-e208. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000277

Zhmud TM, Drozhzhyna GI, Malachkova NV. Cytologic features of the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma-associated dry eye disease. J Ophthalmol (Ukraine). 2023;(4):3-8.https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh2023438

Guglielminetti E, Barabino S, Monaco M, Mantero S, Rolando M. HLA-DR expression in conjunctival cells after latanoprost. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002;18(1):71-75. https://doi.org/10.1089/108076802317233162

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

[1]
Zhmud, T. et al. 2026. Impact of preservative-free vs preserved latanoprost 0.005% on the bulbar conjunctiva in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Ukrainian Journal of Ophthalmology . 3 (Jun. 2026), 4–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.20263411.

Issue

Section

Clinical Ophthalmology

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.