A proposed classification of pseudoexfoliation syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.20262126Keywords:
pseudoexfoliation syndrome, cataract, cataract associated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, phacoemulsification, intraocular lens position, intraocular lens fixation, pseudoexfoliation syndrome classificationAbstract
Purpose: To develop a classification of pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) for use in cataract surgery on the basis of its features.
Material and Methods: This study included 67 patients (67 eyes; age, 61 to 84 years) with PEX-associated cataract who underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Patients were divided into the following categories based on the features of surgical strategy: those that underwent standard phacovitrectomy without zonular protection; those that underwent phacoemulsification and no nucleus rotation during hydrodissection; those that required a capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation due to zonular weakness; and those that required suture IOL fixation.
Results: The patient distribution based on the features of PEX and severity of the effect of PEX on the features of phacoemulsification cataract surgery allowed to determine the relationship of the surgical strategy with the maximum pupil dilation, severity of zonular weakness, increased lens mobility, and capacity of an IOL to maintain its correct position independently. Determining the relationship allowed us to systematize these features and develop a surgical classification of PEX. The classification scheme defines four stages of the syndrome; stage II is subdivided into two categories, category A and category B.
Conclusion: The classification proposed was developed on the basis of the assessment of PEX in the above number of patients, and enabled systematizing the features of patients according to the features of the anterior segment of the eye. Moreover, the study is universal for the stages proposed. The classification can be used as a basis for further research on PEX.
References
1. Yüksel N, Yılmaz Tuğan B. Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma: Clinical Presentation and Therapeutic Options. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 19;53(4):247-256. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.76300
2. Tuteja S, Zeppieri M, Chawla H. Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Glaucoma. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
3. Tekcan H, Mangan MS, Imamoglu S, Alpogan O. Refractive Outcomes of Uneventful Cataract Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;36(3):226-235. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2021.0183
4. Nath M, Odayappan A, Tripathy K, Krishnamurthy P, Nachiappan S. Predicting zonular strength based on maximum pupillary mydriasis in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2021 Jan:146:110402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110402
5. Bezditko PA, Melnyk VO, Kolotilov SV. Spectroscopic analysis of intraocular fluid in patients with cataract and pseudoexfoliation syndrome-associated glaucoma. J Ophthalmol (Ukraine). 2019;2:3-6.
6. Melnyk VO, Palamar BI. Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome: Modern Concepts of Morphological and Clinical Manifestations, Classification, and Treatment. Wiad Lek. 2025;78(9):1866-1873. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/212521
7. Lachovská S, Kristian P, Krowicka. Incidence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome and glaucoma in a set of more than 14,000 eyes of patients operated for a cataract. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2022 Spring; 78(2):56-62. https://doi.org/10.31348/2022/8
8. Rumelaitiene U, Speckauskas M, Tamosiunas A, Radisauskas R, Peto T, Larsen MB, et al. Exploring association between pseudoexfoliation syndrome and ocular aging. Int Ophthalmol. 2022; 43(3): 847-857.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02486-0
9. Tekin K, Inanc M, Elgin U. Monitoring and management of the patient with pseudoexfoliation syndrome: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. (Auckland, N.Z.). 2019; 13: 453-464. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S181444
10. Joshi RS, Singanwad SV. Frequency and surgical difficulties associated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome among Indian rural population scheduled for cataract surgery: Hospital-based data. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;67(2):221-226. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_931_18
11. Ozturk E, Gunduz A. Optimal timing of capsular tension ring implantation in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021 Mar-Apr;84(2):158-162. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20210024
12. Sternfeld A, Luski M, Sella R, Zahavi A, Geffen N, Pereg A, et al. Diagnosis of Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome in Pseudophakic Patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(1):28-33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508336
13. Mastronikolis S, PagkalouM, Baroutas G, Kyriakopoulou K, Makri ΟE, Georgakopoulos CD. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: The critical role of the extracellular matrix in pathogenesis and treatment. IUBMB life. 2022; 74(10): 995-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.2606
14. Fontana L, Coassin M, Iovieno A, Moramarco A, Cimino L. Cataract surgery in patients with pseudoex-foliation syndrome: current updates. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11: 1377-1383. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S142870
15. Drolsum L, Ringvold A, Nicolaissen B. Cataract and glaucoma surgery in pseudoexfoliation syndrome: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scandinavica. 2007; 85(8): 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00903.x
16. Shakeel R. Shareef, Сataract Surgery with Zonular Issue. Review of Ophthalmology [Internet]. Published 10 August 2021. Available from: https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/cataract-surgery-with-zonular-issues.
17. Khiun F Tjia. A Low Fluidics Parameters Strategy A Low Fluidics Parameters Strategy. [Internet]. Published 2007. CRST Global. Available from: https://crstodayeurope.com/articles/2007-mar/0307_14-php/
18. Borkenstein AF, Borkenstein EM. Surgical experience with a redesigned, fully preloaded, hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in challenging cases of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, phacodonesis, and small pupils. Clin Ophthalmology. 2019; 13: 199-206.
https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S194420
19. Shahid SM, Flores-Sánchez BC, Chan EW, Anguita R, Ahmed SN, Wickham L, et al. Scleral-fixated intraocular lens implants-evolution of surgical techniques and future developments. Eye (London). 2021; 35(11): 2930-2961. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01571-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Melnyk V. O., Vasylieva L. S.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.
