Rare neurogenic retinal tumors in adults: morphological features and diagnostic challenges

Authors

  • M. V. Lytvynenko Odesa National Medical University; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • V. V. Alekseeva Kharkiv National Medical University; Kharkiv (Ukraine), Kharkiv International Medical University; Kharkiv (Ukraine)
  • V. V. Gargin Kharkiv National Medical University; Kharkiv (Ukraine), Kharkiv International Medical University; Kharkiv (Ukraine)
  • N. V. Neskoromna Odesa National Medical University; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • O. L. Koshelnyk Odesa National Medical University; Odesa (Ukraine)
  • O. V. Artemov SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202263034

Keywords:

ocular tumors, , histopathology, immunohistochemistry

Abstract

Background: The histological diagnosis of neurogenic tumors remains a challenge, which may be indicated particularly by the fact that new entities appeared in the new edition of the World Health organization (WHO) classification.

Purpose: To review the histomorphologic and immunohistochemic features of rare variants of neurogenic ocular (retinal) tumors in adults.

Material and Methods: Six rare ocular tumors were selected for the study from all clinical material submitted for pathohistological examination from 2017 to 2020 based on the presence of morphological evidence of neurogenic differentiation.

Results: The study sample of six rare neurogenic retinal tumors in adults was conventionally divided into three types: (1) retinal tumors immunohistochemically similar to cellular  ependymoma, but histologically similar to retinoblastoma; (2) tumors showing no histological pattern characteristic for dictyoma, but the immunohistochemical features of neuroepithelial differentiation; and (3) tumors showing histological patterns similar to medulloepithelioma, but  the immunohistochemical features of glial markers.

Conclusion: Obviously, when dividing these tumors into histogenetic groups, not only the histological structure and immunohistochemical profile, but also tumor location and typical patient age should be taken into account.

References

Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Bernd AJ, et al. The 2007 WHO Classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007; 114(2):97-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

Gupta A, Dwivedi T. A simplified overview of World Health Organization classification update of central nervous system tumors 2016. J Neurosci Rural Pract. Oct-Dec. 2017; 8(4):629-641. https://doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_168_17

Biswasm J, Manim B, Shaunmugen M. Retinoblastoma in adults: report of three cases and review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar-Apr;44(5):409-14.

Mackley R.A. Retinoblastoma in a 52-year old man. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963 Mar;69:325-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1963.00960040331013

Takahahi T, Namura S, Inoue M., Isayama Y, Sashikata T. Retinoblastoma in a 26-year old adult. Ophthalmology. 1983 Feb;90(2):179-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(83)34582-6

Vit VV. [Pathology of the eye, ocular adnexa and orbit: a two-volume monograph]. Vol. 2. Odesa: Astroprint; 2019. Russian.

Shields JA, Eagle RC, Jr, Shields CL, Marr BP. Aggressive retinal astrocytomas in four patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:139-47; discussion 147-8.

Vit VV. [Visual system tumors: a two-volume monograph]. Vol. 2. Odesa: Astroprint; 2009. Russian.

Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231-1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106

Schabadasch A. Intramurale nervengeflechte des darmrohrs. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1930;10:320-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02450699

Gargin V, Radutny R, Titova G, Bibik D, Kirichenko A, Bazhenov O. Application of the computer vision system for evaluation of pathomorphological images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 40th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology, ELNANO 2020. 22-24 April 2020, Kyiv, Ukraine. 469-73. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELNANO50318.2020.9088898

Garancher A, Lin CY, Morabito M, et al. NRL and CRX Define Photoreceptor Identity and Reveal Subgroup-Specific Dependencies in Medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(3):435-449.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.006

Stenzinger A, Alber M, Allgäuer M, et al. Artificial intelligence and pathology: From principles to practice and future applications in histomorphology and molecular profiling. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Sep;84:129-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.02.011

Sulym H, Lyndin M, Sulym L, et al. Detection of melanin in the rat skin. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2022;50(295):21-4.

Lytvynenko M, Shkolnikov V, Bocharova T, Sychova L, Gargin V. Peculiarities of proliferative activity of cervical squamous cancer in HIV infection. Georgian Med News. 2017;(270):10-15.

Goto H, Yamakawa N, Komatsu H. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry of choroidal melanocytoma demonstrated by local resection: A case report. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2021;23:101147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101147

Published

2025-08-27

How to Cite

1.
Lytvynenko MV, Alekseeva VV, Gargin VV, Neskoromna NV, Koshelnyk OL, Artemov OV. Rare neurogenic retinal tumors in adults: morphological features and diagnostic challenges. J.ophthalmol. (Ukraine) [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 27 [cited 2025 Aug. 28];(6):30-4. Available from: https://ua.ozhurnal.com/index.php/files/article/view/313

Issue

Section

Clinical Ophthalmology

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.