Современные возможности конфокальной микроскопии

N. V. Pasechnikova; G. I. Drozhzhyna; O. N. Ivanova; E. V. Vansovich; I. O. Nasinnik

doi:10.31288/oftalmolzh2014297111

Authors

N. V. Pasechnikova SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
G. I. Drozhzhyna SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
O. N. Ivanova SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
E. V. Vansovich SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
I. O. Nasinnik SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh2014297111

Keywords:

confocal microscopy, cornea

Abstract

Confocal microscopy of the cornea is a modern method of research, allowing to carry out monitoring the state of the cornea in vivo due to the visualization of the tissue at the histomorphological level in the state of functional activity. Confocal microscopy is used for the research, expert and clinical purposes. Confocal microscope Confoscan 4 (NIDEK Technologies, Japan) allows to investigate the cornea by the non-invasive method, through immersion gel. Scanning the cornea occurs throughout its thickness in the direction of the endothelium to the epithelium with determination of the qualitative and quantitative composition of cells and nerves. The study allows to make the analysis of endothelial polymorphism pleomegatism and cell density. Z-ring nozzle accomplished the optical pachymetry of the cornea.

In 2013 we conducted the confocal microscopy in 69patients: hereditary corneal dystrophies — 6, endothelial — epithelial corneal dystrophy including Fuchs dystrophy, cornea guttata and pseudoexfoliation keratopathy — 15, keratoconus — 18, SSG — 12, outcomes of keratitis — 11, etc.

Conclusion. The analysis of the literature data and results of our own research show that confocal microscopy is a unique diagnostic method in a wide range of diseases of the cornea, with possible evaluation of the regeneration processes of the cornea, complications after different types of surgery on the cornea, and influence of the various pharmacological drugs, contact lenses and implants. The possibility of the confocal microscope to investigate the corneal tissue with the visualization of microorganisms, inflammatory and epithelial cells, nerve fibers, fibrosis opens prospects for using this method in ophthalmology.

References

1.Аветисов С. Э. Офтальмология. Национальное руководство //М.,изд. Гэотар-Медиа.,2008.

2.А.ио X. Л., Хавалой Х., Негри Э. П. и соавт. Качество интерфейса роговичного лоскута после ЛАСИК. Ис-следование с помощью конфокального микроскопа// Офтальмология. - 2004. - том 1, № 3. - С.12-21

3.Бездітко П. А. Застосування методу конфокальної мікроскопії у діагностиці діабетичної нейропатії рогівки / П. А. Бездітко, О. В. Заволока, М. Г. Лисенко // Проблеми сучасної медичної науки та освіти. - 2008. -№ 3. - С. 17-19.

4.Майчук Д. Ю. Принцип работы и клиническое применение конфокального микроскопа Confoscan 3 при дифференциальной диагностике заболеваний роговицы // Рефракционная хирургия и офтальмоло¬гия. - 2004. - том4. - № 1. - С.35-38

5.Майчук Д. Ю. Конфокальная микроскопия - принцип действия, области применения и пример клинического исследования для дифференциальной диагностики патологии роговицы / Федоровские чтения - 2006. Научно-практическая конференция. «Современные методы диагностики в офтальмологии. Анатомо-физиологические основы патологии органа зрения»: Сб.научн.ст. - М.,2006. - С.351- 354.

6.Auran JD, Koester CJ, Kleiman NJ, et al. Scanning slit confocal microscopic observation of cell morphology and movement within the normal human anterior cornea. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:33- 41.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(95)31057-3

7.Auran JD, Starr MB, Koester CJ, et al. In vivo scanning slit confocal microscopy of Acanthamoeba keratitis. A case report. Cornea. 1994; 13:183-5.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199403000-00012

8.Avunduk AM, Senft CJ, Emerah S, et al. Corneal healing after uncomplicated LASIK and its relationship to refractive changes: A six-month prospective confocal study. IOVS. 2004;45:1334- 9.https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-1025

9.Berlau J., Becker H.-H.,Stave J. Et al. Depth and age-dependent distribution of keratocytes in healthy human corneas. - J/ Cataract. Refract.Surg. - 2002. - vol.28. - P.611-616.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01227-5

10.Beuerman RW, Laird JA, Kaufman SC, et al. Quantification of real-time confocal images of the human cornea. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;54:197- 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(94)90193-7

11.B?hnke M, Masters BR. Confocal microscopy of the cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18:553-628.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-9462(98)00028-7

12.B?hnke M, Thaer A, Schipper I. Confocal microscopy reveals persisting stromal changes after myopic photorefrac-tive keratectomy in zero haze corneas. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1998;82:1393-400.https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.82.12.1393

13.B?hnke M, Masters BR. Long-term contact lens wear induces a corneal degeneration with micro-dot deposits in the corneal stroma. Ophthalmology.1997;104:1887-96.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30011-6

14.Brookes NH, Loh I-P, et al. Involvement of corneal nerves in the progression of keratoconus. Experimental Eye Research. 2003;77:515- 24.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4835(03)00148-9

15.Calvillo MP, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Corneal reinnervation after LASIK: prospective 3-year longitudinal study. IOVS. 2004;45:3991-6.https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0561

16.Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Alizadeh H, et al. Clinical and diagnostic use of in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1444- 54.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(93)31457-0

17.Chew SJ, Beuerman RW, Assouline M, et al. Early diagnosis of infectious keratitis with in vivo real time confocal microscopy. CLAO Journal. 1992;18:197-201.

18.Chiou AG.-Y, Beuerman RW, Kaufman SC,.et al. Confocal microscopy in cornea lattice corneal dystrophy // Graefes Arch.Clin. Ophtalmol. - 1999. - vol.237. - P.697- 701.https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050299

19.Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Beuerman RW, et al. Confocal microscopy in posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Ophthalmologica. 1999b;213:211-13.https://doi.org/10.1159/000027423

20.Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Beuerman RW, et al. Differential diagnosis of linear corneal images on confocal microscopy. Cornea. 1999c;18:63-6.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199901000-00011

21.Ciancaglini M., Carpineto P.,Doronzo E. et al. Morphological evaluation of Schnyder s central crystalline dystrophy by confocal microscopy before and after phototherapeutic keratectomy // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. - 2001. -vol.27. - P.1892- 1895.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00840-3

22.Cohen RA, Chew SJ, Gebhardt BM, et al. Confocal microscopy of corneal graft rejection. Cornea. 1995;14:467-72.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199509000-00005

23.Corbett MC, Prydal JI, Verma S, et al. An in vivo investigation of the structures responsible for corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy and their effect on visual function. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1366-80.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30495-8

24.Dilly P. N. Coontribution of the epitelium to the stability of the tear film // Trans.Ophtalmol. Soc.U. K. - 1985. -vol.104(4). - P.381- 389

25.Dilly P. N. Tandem scanning reflected light microscopy of the cornea // Scanning. - 1988. - N10. - P.153- 156.https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950100407

26.Efron N, Perez-Gomez I, Morgan PB. Confocal microscopic observations of stromal keratocytes during extended contact lens wear. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2002;85:156-60.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2002.tb03028.x

27.Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW, et al. Effect of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis on epithelial and stromal thickness: a confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmology. 2002a;109:1447-52.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01106-5

28.Florakis G. J., Moazami G., Schubert H. et al. Scanning slit confocal microscopy of fungal keratitis // Arch. Ophtalmol. - 1997. - vol. 115. - P.1461-1463.https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160631019

29.Font RL, Fine BS. Ocular pathology in Fabry's disease. Histochemical and electron microscope observations. Am J Pathol. 1972;97:671.

30.Furrer P., Mayer J. M., Gurny R. Confocal microscopy as a tool for the investigation of the anterior part of the eye // J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. - 1997. - vol.13. - P.559- 578.https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.1997.13.559

31.Grupcheva CN, Wong T, Riley AF, et al. Assessing the sub-basal nerve plexus of the living healthy human cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2002;30:187-90.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00507.x

32.Heinz P, Bodanowitz S, Wiegand W, et al. In vivo observation of corneal nerve regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy with a confocal videomicroscope. German Journal of Ophthalmology. 1997. - vol.5. - P.373-377.

33.Hollingsworth JG, Efron N. Confocal microscopy of the corneas of long-term rigid contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2004;27:57- 64.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-0484(04)00018-9

34.Hollingsworth JG, Efron N, Tullo AB. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy in keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:254-60.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00278.x

35.Jalbert I, Stapleton F. Effect of lens wear on corneal stroma: preliminary findings. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology. 1999; 27:211-13.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00205.x

36.Jester J. V., Petroll W. M., Garana R. M. R. et al. Comparison of in vitro and ex vivo cellular structure in rabbit eyes detected by tandem scanning microscopy // J. Microsc. - 1992. - vol.165. - P.169-181.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1992.tb04314.x

37.Kallinikos P, Berhanu M, O'Donnell C, et al. Corneal nerve tortuosity in diabetic patients with neuropathy. IOVS. 2004; 45:418-22.https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0637

38.Kaufman SC, Beuerman RW, Kaufman HE. Diagnosis of advanced Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy with the confocal microscope. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1993; 116:652-3.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)73217-9

39.Kauffmann T, Bodanowitz S, Hesse L, et al. Corneal reinnervation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: an in vivo study with a confocal videomicroscope. German Journal of Ophthalmology. 1996; 5:508-12.

40.Kaufman SC, Hamano H, Beuerman RW, et al. Transient corneal stromal and endothelial changes following soft contact lens wear: a study with confocal microscopy. CLAO Journal. 1996;22:127-32.

41.Kaufman SC, Musch DC, Belin MW, et al. Confocal microscopy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:396-406.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.12.002

42.Kobayashi A, Sugiyama K. In vivo laser confocal microscopy findings for Bowman's layer dystrophies (Thiel-Behnke and Reis-Bucklers corneal dystrophies) Ophthalmology. 2007;114:69- 75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.076

43.Ku J. Y., Grupcheva C. N., McGhee C. N. Microstructual analysis of Salzmann's nodular degeneration by in vivo confocal microscopy // Clin. Exp. Ophtalmol. - 2002. - vol.30. - P.367-368.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00558.x

44.Linna T, Tervo T. Real-time confocal microscopic observations on human corneal nerves and wound healing after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Current Eye Research. 1997;16:640-9.https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.16.7.640.5058

45.Malik RA, Kallinikos P, Abbott CA, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 2003;46:683-8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-003-1086-8

46.Mantyjarvi M, Tuppurainen K, Ikaheimo K. Ocular side effects of amiodarone. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:360- 6.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00118-5

47.Masters BR, Thaer AA. In vivo real-time confocal microscopy of wing cells in the human cornea: A new benchmark for in vivo corneal microscopy. Bioimages. 1995;3:7-11.

48.Masters BR, Bohnke M. Three-dimensional confocal microscopy of the human cornea in vivo // Ophtalmic. Res. - 2001. - vol.33. - P.125- 135.https://doi.org/10.1159/000055658

49.Mastropasqua L, Nubile M. Basic principles of confocal microscopy of the cornea. Slack Incorporated; USA: 2002. pp. 1-5.

50.Mathers WD,Lane J. A., Zimmerman M. B. Assessment of the tear film with tandem scanning confocal microscopy // Cornea. - 1997. - vol.16. - P.162- 168.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199703000-00008

51.Mathers WD, Goldberg MA, et al. Coexistent Acanthamoeba keratitis and herpetic keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:714-18.https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150716002

52.Maurice D. M. A scanning slit optical microscope // Invest. Ophtalmol. - 1974. - vol.13. - P.1033-1037.

53.Minsky M. Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope // Scanning. - 1988. - vol.10. - P.128-138.https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950100403

54.Mitooka K, Ramirez M, Maguire LJ, et al. Keratocyte density of central human cornea after laser in situ keratomileusis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2002;133:307-14.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01421-0

55.Moilanen JA, Vesaluoma MH, Muller LJ, et al. Long-term corneal morphology after PRK by in vivo confocal microscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:1064-9.https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0247

56.M?ller LJ, Pels L, Vrensen GFJM. Ultrastructural organisation of human corneal nerves. IOVS. 1996:476- 88.

57.Mustonen RK, McDonald MB, Srivannaboon S, et al. Normal human corneal cell populations evaluated by in vivo scanning slit confocal microscopy. Cornea. 1998;17:485-92.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199809000-00005

58.Nagel S., Wiegand W., Thaer A. A. Corneal changes and corneal healing after keratomileusis in situ. In vivo studies using confocal slit-microscopy // Ophtalmology. - 1995. - vol.92. - P.397-401.

59.O'Donnell C, Efron N. Corneal endothelial cell morphometry and corneal thickness in diabetic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:858- 62.https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OPX.0000145029.76675.F7

60.Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2001;20:374-84.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200105000-00008

61.Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves in soft contact lens wear. A comparative study using confocal microscopy. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2003;23:163- 74.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00106.x

62.Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Normal human keratocyte density and corneal thickness measurement by using contact microscopy in vivo // Invest. Ophthal.Vis. Sci. -. 2001. - vol.42. - P.333- 339.

63.Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Confocal microscopy in vivo in corneas of long-term contact lens wearers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002;43:995-1003.

64.Patel DV, McGhee CN. Mapping the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in keratoconus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. IOVS. 2006;47:1348- 51.https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1217

65.Pe'er J, Vidaurri J, Halfon ST, et al. Association between corneal arcus and some of the risk factors for coronary artery disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67:795- 8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.67.12.795

66.Petroll WM, Jester JV, Cavanagh HD. In vivo confocal imaging. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1996; 36:93- 129.

67.Petroll W. M., Yu A., Li J. et al. A prototype two-detector confocal microscope for in vivo corneal imaging // Scan¬ning. - 2002. - vol.24. - P.163-170.https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950240401

68.Pfister DR, Cameron JD, Krachmer JH, et al. Confocal microscopy findings of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121:119-128.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70576-8

69.Richter A, Slowik C, Somodi S, et al. Corneal reinnervation following penetrating keratoplasty: correlation of es-thesiometry and confocal microscopy. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996;5:513-17.

70.Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Muller LJ, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy after herpes keratitis. Cornea. 2002;21:265- 9.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200204000-00006

71.Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Immonen IJ, et al. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2915-21.

72.Rothstein A., Auran J., Wittpenn J. et al. Confocal microscopy in Meretoja syndrome // Cornea. - 2002. - vol.21. - P.364- 367.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200205000-00007

73.Ruckhofer J., Bohnke M., Alzner E. et al. Confocal microscopy after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments // Ophtalmology. - 2000. - vol.107. - P.2144-2151.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00387-0

74.Simo Mannion L, Tromans C, O'Donnell C. An evaluation of corneal nerve morphology and function in moderate keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2005;28:185-92.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2005.10.005

75.Slowik C., Somodi S., Richter A., Guthoff R. Assessment of corneal alteration following laser in situ keratomileusis by confocal slit scanning microscopy // Ger/ J/ Ophtal-mol. - 1997. - № 15. - P.526- 531/

76.Somodi S, Hahnel C, Slowik C, et al. Confocal in vivo microscopy and confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy in keratoconus // Ger. J. Ophthalmol. - 1997. - vol.5. - P.518-525.

77.Sultan G., Baudouin C., Auzerie O. et.al. Cornea in Marfan disease: Orbscan and in vivo confocal microscopy analisis // Invest. Ophtalmol. Vis. Sci. - 2002. - vol.43. - P.1757-1764.

78.Su Pei-Yuang, Fung-Rong Hu, Yen-Ming Chen, et al. Dendritiform cells found in central cornea by in-vivo confocal microscopy in a patient with mixed bacterial keratitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2006;14:241-4.https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940600732398

79.Sutphin JE, Kantor AL, Mathers WD, et al. Evaluation of infectious crystalline keratitis with confocal microscopy in a case series. Cornea. 1997; 16:21-6.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199701000-00005

80.Vesaluoma M. H., Linna T. U., Sankila E. - M. et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of a family with Schnyder crystallin corneal dystrophy // Ophtalmology. - 199. - vol.106. - P.944- 951.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00514-X

81.Vinciguerra P., Torres I., Camesasca F. I. Applications of confocal microscopy in refractive surgery // J. Refract. Surg. - 2002. - vol.18. - P.378-381.https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20020502-21

82.Werner L. P., Issid K., WernerL., et al. Salzmann's corneal degeneration associated with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy // Cornea. - 2000. - vol.19. - P.121- 123.https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200001000-00024

83.Werner LP, Werner L, Dighiero P, et al. Confocal microscopy in Bowman and stromal corneal dystrophies. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1697-704.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90358-5

84.Wiebers DO, Hollenhorst RW, Goldstein NP. The ophthalmologic manifestations of Wilson's disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977;52:409-16.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(25)09856-8

85.Wilson SE, Kim W.-J. Keratocyte apoptosis: implications on corneal wound healing, tissue organization, and disease // Invest. Ophtalmol. Vis. Sci. - 1998. - vol.39. - P.220-226.

86.Winchester K, Mathers WD, Sutphin JE, et al. Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis in vivo with confocal microscopy.