Особенности биоэлектрических потенциалов наружных горизонтальных прямых мышц глаза при сходящемся и расходящемся содружественном неаккомодационном косоглазии

I.M. Boichuk; V.P. Mazur

doi:10.31288/oftalmolzh2015635

Authors

I.M. Boichuk SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)
V.P. Mazur SI "The Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy of the NAMS of Ukraine"; Odesa (Ukraine)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh2015635

Keywords:

співдружня неакомодаційна косоокість, зовнішні прямі м'язи, біопотенціали

Abstract

Introduction. There is no objective method currently available for assessing the extraocular muscles functional status, which could be considered definitely effective and convenient for the extensive use in ophthalmological practice. Also, there is no comparative analysis of bioelectric potentials of the extraocular horizontal rectus muscles in concomitant esotropia and exotropia.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the functional status of bioelectric potentials of the extraocular horizontal rectus muscles in concomitant esotropia and exotropia using surface electromyography (SEMG).

Materials and methods. There were 18 children under follow-up (12.9 ± SD3.2) years of age, of which 12 (24 eyes) had concomitant esotropia and 6 (12 eyes) with concomitant exotropia, and healthy children (28) of the same age. Horizontal muscle functional status was determined by computer myograph M-TEST-2.

Results. The frequency in esotropia of bioelectric potentials of the internal rectus muscle is much higher than the frequency of the extraocular rectus muscle (128 Hz ± 19.35 and 60.9 ± 16.7 Hz, respectively, p = 0.0003). The frequency in exotropia of bioelectric potentials of the extraocular rectus muscles was in average higher than the frequency of the intraocular rectus muscle (109 ± 9.9 Hz and 55.0 ± 1.57, respectively, p = 0.004). The frequency response when compared in healthy children showed no differences between the internal and external line (63.0 ± 19.9 Hz and 63.7 ± 21.1 Hz, p> 0.05).

Conclusions.

1. The results suggest that the children with concomitant strabismus have functional disorders of the horizontal rectus muscles, as evidenced by SEMG data.

2. It was established that the bioelectric potentials frequency of the intraocular rectus muscle in esotropia and extraocular rectus muscle in exotropia is higher than the frequency of the relevant muscles in the healthy children.

3. The bioelectric potential of the intraocular and extraocular rectus muscles in the healthy children does not differ, and in children with concomitant esotropia and exotropia differs significantly.

References

1. Avetisov ES [Guidelines of pediatric pediatric ophthalmology]. In: Kovalevsky EI, Khvatova AV. M. Meditsina, 1987:185. Russian.

2. Avetisov ES [Concomitant strabismus]. M .: Meditsina. 1977. Russian.

3. Gromakina EV [Pathogenetic aspects of strabismus in children with perinatal pathology: author's thesis for the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences]. Krasnoyarsk. 2002. Russian.

4. Gecht BM [Theoretical and clinical electromyography]. L. Nauka. 1988. Russian.

5. Kashchenko TP [New possibilities of diagnostics and treatment of oculomotor pathology]. In: IX Congress of Russian Ophthalmologists: thes. of reports. Moscow, 2010. Russian.

6. Boychuk IM, Mazur VP [A new method of surface electromyography of direct eye muscles in children]. Oftalmol. Zh. 2014;3:15-18. Russian.

7. Kryzhanovsky GN, Pozdnyakov OM, Polgar AA [Pathology synaptic apparatus muscles]. M. Meditsina, 1974. Russian.

8. Plisov IL [Experience of paralytic strabismus treatment by hemodenervation of extraocular muscles]. In: сoll. of scient. papers. Ophthalmology of the Black Sea. Krasnodar, 2006. Russian.

9. Rozemblyum YZ, Chernyshov SG [Diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of diplopia muscle origin; method. recommendations]. M. 2004. Russian.

10. Rozemblyum YZ [Rehabilitation of patients with diplopia: Method. recommendations]. Ministry of Health of the RSFSR. [Ed. Rozemblyum YZ, Kashchenko TP], 1988. Russian.

11. Semyonovskaya EN, Khvatova AV [Electrooculography in strabismus]. In: Concomitant strabismus and amblyopia. The researchers note. M. 1962. Russian.

12. Smolyaninova IL [Paretic strabismus in children: author. of dis. ... Dr. med. Sciences]. M. 1972. Russian.

13. Shaytor VM [Long-term effects of perinatal damage to the nervous system in children: author's thesis for the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences]. SPb. 2008. Russian.

14. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. Mosby Year Book. 1991:641- 707.

15. Breinin GM and Moidaver J. Electromyography of human extra ocular muscles. In: Arch. Opht. 1955;54:206. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1955.00930020204006

16. Desmedt JE. New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Basel. Karger. 1973:1-3.

17. Engel WK, Brooke MH, Nelson PG. Histochemical studies of denervated or tenotomized cat muscle illustrating difficulties in relating experimental animal conditions to human neuromuscular diseases. In: Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1966.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb41164.x

18. Lennerstrand G. What can eye muscle studies tell us about strabismus? In: Transactions 28th Meeting ESA. Bergen. Norway. 2003:65-75.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003077541-15

19. Sasaki T, Suzuki K, Matsumoto M. et al. Origins of surface potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of oculomotor nerves: are they related to electrooculographic or electromyographic events. J Neurosurgery. 2002. Oct;97(4):941-944. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.97.4.0941