Clinical assessment of the changes in corneal endothelium cell density, IOP and correlated factors after phakic iol implantation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202461017Abstract
Background. Refractive errors are leading pathology of visual organ among active age population. Myopia is one of the main causes of disability and blindness.
Purpose. To assess the clinical outcomes of changes in endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure (IOP), and correlated factors after phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with high myopia during the 6-month postoperative period.
Material and Methods. In this observational study, 58 eyes of 30 patients were investigated after spheric implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation. The main clinical outcomes were uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure, and correlated factors. In this study, all patients’ postoperative outcomes were evaluated at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.
Results. In total, 58 eyes of 30 patients underwent spheric ICL model implantation at the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Eye Microsurgery from January 2023 to June 2023. The mean age of patients was 27.52±6.61. The mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent was -10.59±3.41 D, respectively, which postoperative spherical refractive measures reduced to -0.92±0.37 D. The mean IOP was 15.9±1.92 mm Hg preoperatively. The mean IOP has changed until 15.86±3.3 mm Hg during the 6-month post-operative period.
Conclusion. Implantable collamer lens implantation is a safe, effective, and alternative refractive surgery for correction of high myopia in patients with thin corneas and several contraindications for laser correction.
References
Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012; 32:3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00884.x
Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015; 519: 276-278. https://doi.org/10.1038/519276a
World Health Organization. Report of the 2030 targets on effective coverage of eye care [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 22]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/363158
Comaish IF, Lawless MA. Phakic intraocular lenses. Cur Opin Ophthalmology 2002; 13:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200202000-00003
Packer et al. The implantable collamer lens with a central port: review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmology. 2018; 12: 2427-2438. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S188785
Karandikar S, Bhandari V, Reddy J. Outcomes of implantable collamer lens v4 and v4c for correction of high myopia. Nepal Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; 7(14): 164 - 172. https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v7i2.14967
Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2012;154: 3, 486-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.001
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicenter study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2018;102:2, 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310164
Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, Chen Y, Wang X and Zhou X. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmology 2018;18:1, 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0805-3
Yan Z, Miao F, Zhao F et al. Two-year outcomes of Visian implantable collamer lens with a central hole for correcting high myopia. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018;2018: 9 article ID 8678352. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8678352
Niu L, Miao H, Han T, Ding L, Wang X and Zhou X. Visual outcomes of Visian ICL implantation for high myopia in patients with shallow anterior chamber depth. BMC Ophthalmology. 2019;19:1, 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1132-z
Moser CL, Martin-Baranera M, Garat M, et al. Corneal edema and intraocular pressure after cataract surgery: randomized comparison of Healon5 and Amvisc plus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2359-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.004
Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A. Matched population comparison of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 modalities for correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol 2017;11:1253-63. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S127101
Cao X, Wu W, Wang Y, et al. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with central hole for moderate-to-high myopia: first experience in China. Medicine 2016;95:e4641. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004641
Hyun J, Lim DH, Eo DR, et al. A comparison of visual outcomes and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL): V4 versus V4c. PloS One 2017;12:e0183335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183335
Yang W, et al. Four-year observation of the changes in corneal endothelium cell density and correlated factors after implantable collamer lens V4c implantation. Br J Ophthalmol 2021;105:625-630. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316144
Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, et al. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICLV4c). BMC Ophthalmol 2018;18:141-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0805-3
Yan Z, Miao H, Zhao F, et al. Two-year outcomes of visian implantable collamer lens with central hole for correcting high myopia. J Ophthalmol 2018;2018:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7096326
Sachdev et al. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between two types of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019; 67: 1061-1065. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1501_18
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, et al. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 96: 409-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300148
Kamiya et al. Monovision by implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (hole ICL) for early presbyopia. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 11302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11539-9
Chen et al. One-year natural course of corneal densitometry in high myopic patients after implantation of an implantable collamer lens (model V4c). BMC Ophthalmology. 2020; 20: 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-1320-x
Cao et al. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for moderate-to-high myopia: first experience in China. Medicine (USA, Baltimore) 2016; 95: e4641. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004641
Pjano et al. Refractive outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Med Arch. 2017; 71: 93-96. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.93-96
Bhandary V, Karandikar S, Reddy JK, et al. Implantable collamer lens V4b and V4c for correction of high myopia. J Curr Ophthalmol 2015;27:76-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2016.01.001
Lee J, Kim Y, Park S, et al. Long-term clinical results of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation to correct myopia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016;44:481-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12691
Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:779-82.
Choi KH et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy for determination visian implantable contact lens length in phakic IOL implantation. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2007; 23: 362-367. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20070401-08
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yusupov A.F., Karimova M.Kh., Zaynutdinov N.N., Kamilov Kh. M., Kasimova M.S.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.