Comprehensive ophthalmological assessment in children with down syndrome: a cross-sectional study from Uzbekistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.202653037Keywords:
Down syndrome, Down’s Syndrome Medical Interest Group, multiple ophthalmological disorders, eyelid and ocular adnexa anomalies, oculomotor system disorders, ocular surface disorders, refractive Errors, retinal and optic nerve pathologyAbstract
Objective. To determine the prevalence and spectrum of ocular abnormalities in children with Down syndrome in Uzbekistan using an adapted, comprehensive clinical and functional ophthalmological assessment protocol.
Materials and Methods. A descriptive observational clinical study was carried out at the Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center for Eye Microsurgery and included 61 children (122 eyes) aged from 4 months to 15 years with genetically confirmed Down syndrome. All participants underwent an expanded ophthalmological examination that included adapted visometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, objective refraction assessment and autorefractometry, tonometry, B-scan ultrasonography, corneal Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam and WaveLight Oculyzer), and OCT. Examination techniques were modified according to the patients’ age, cognitive characteristics, and degree of cooperation. Quantitative parameters were compared with published age-specific normative values.
Results. Multiple concurrent ocular findings were present in the majority of children; only 6.6% had no detectable ocular pathology. The most common findings were epicanthus (91.8%), refractive error (73.8%), Brushfield spots (72.1%), strabismus (27.9%), lacrimal drainage pathology (18.0%), amblyopia (13.1%), keratoconus (4.9%), and optic nerve anomalies (4.9%). Mean cycloplegic spherical equivalent was +0.20 ± 2.76 D, mean intraocular pressure 14.4 ± 2.9 mmHg, and mean axial length 22.83 ± 1.49 mm. Comprehensive tomography additionally detected suspected subclinical corneal ectasia in two children in whom routine examination had found no keratoconus.
Conclusion. A structured and multidisciplinary ophthalmological examination algorithm substantially improves the detection of ocular pathology in patients with Down syndrome, including subclinical abnormalities. The integration of adapted comprehensive assessment protocols into routine ophthalmological follow-up may contribute to improved visual outcomes, enhanced social adaptation, and reduced long-term healthcare burden..
References
De Graaf G, Buckley F, Skotko BG. Estimation of the number of people with Down syndrome in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00748-y
Rojas-Carabali W, Cortés-Albornoz MC, Flórez-Esparza G, Cifuentes-González C, de-la-Torre A, Talero-Gutiérrez C. Ophthalmic manifestations in children with Down Syndrome in Bogotá, Colombia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 May 15;23(1):216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02863-y
Huete-García A, Otaola-Barranquero M. Demographic Assessment of Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):352. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010352
Haseeb A, Huynh E, ElSheikh RH, ElHawary AS, Scelfo C, Ledoux DM, Maidana DE, Elhusseiny AM. Down syndrome: a review of ocular manifestations. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 30;14:25158414221101718.https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414221101718
Mathan JJ, Simkin SK, Gokul A, McGhee CNJ. Down syndrome and the eye: Ocular characteristics and ocular assessment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022:S0039625722000431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.03.006
Muñoz-Ortiz J, Charry-Sánchez JD, Bechara-Arango I. et al. Prevalence of ophthalmological manifestations in pediatric and adolescent populations with Down syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Syst Rev. 2022; 11: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01940-5
Sun E, Kraus CL. The Ophthalmic Manifestations of Down Syndrome. Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;10(2):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020341
Kruszka P, Porras AR, Sobering AK, Ikolo FA, La Qua S, Shotelersuk V, et al. Down syndrome in diverse populations. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2017;173:42-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38043
Hsieh CJ, Fang IM, Lin FG. Co-existence of strabismus and Down syndrome in relation to visual impairment in institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities: Implications for vision care. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2025 Sep;50(3):330-338. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2024.2446218
Waugh KA, Wilkins HM, Smith KP, Ptomey LT. Charting the future: current and future directions in translational research for individuals with Down syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2025 Jul 8;17(1):38.https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-025-09630-8
Ljubic A, Trajkovski V, Stankovic B, Tojtovska B, Langmann A, Dimitrova G, Jovanovic I, Tesic M. Systemic and Ophthalmic Manifestations in Different Types of Refractive Errors in Patients with Down Syndrome. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 26;58(8):995. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58080995
Makateb A, Hashemi H, Farahi A, et al. Ocular alignment, media, and eyelid disorders in Down syndrome. Strabismus. 2020;28:42-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2019.1699582
Foster MJ, Chu J, Shaia J, Singh RP, Talcott KE. Prevalence and diversity of retinal disease in adults with Down syndrome. Eye (Lond). 2025 Feb;39(3):505-515. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03508-0
Down's Syndrome Medical Interest Group (DSMIG). Basic medical surveillance essentials for people with Down syndrome: ophthalmic conditions. Revision 3. London: DSMIG; 2025 May.
Singh SE, Ostrin LA, Kerber KL, Concepcion C, Gong C, Lal B, Flitcroft I, Harrington S, Loughman J, Saunders K, Vera-Diaz FA. Refractive Error and Axial Length (REAL) Study: Feasibility of a population study in the United States. Optom Vis Sci. 2025 May 1;102(5):280-288. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002258
Panke, K., & Jorova, M. (2024). Objective Refraction Status before and after Cycloplegia: From Childhood to Young Adulthood. Vision, 8(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8030051
Rehůrek J, Spicarová R, Vancurová J. Fyziologické hodnoty nitroocního tlaku u dĕtí [Normal values of intraocular pressure in children]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2000 Oct;56(6):361-5. Czech.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Heydarian S, Emamian MH, Fotouhi A. Intraocular pressure and its association with ocular biometrics in Iranian children. J Optom. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100523
Dusek WA, Pierscionek BK, McClelland JF. Age variations in intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy Austrian school children. Eye (Lond). 2012 Jun;26(6):841-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.54
Lee KE, Tam EK, Rook BS, Salim S, Elhusseiny AM. Intraocular Pressure in Children. In: El Sayed, Y.M., Elhusseiny, A.M. (eds) Childhood Glaucoma. Springer, 2024. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61073-8_10
Huang L-Y, Yu L-T, Hsia N-Y, Hsieh Y-C, Lin H-J (2025) The association between subfoveal choroidal thickness and refractive error in Taiwanese children: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 20(5): e0316306.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316306
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Umida Khamraeva, Muyassar Karimova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.
