Ultrastructural changes of the retinal neuroepithlium of rabbits after subthreshold laser influence by laser generating radiation with the wavelength of 532 nm, 577 nm and 810 nm with application of milliimpulse and microimpulse operating conditions of the laser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201463439Keywords:
ultrastructural changes of rabbit retinal neuroepithelium, subthreshold laser actionAbstract
Introduction. This article studied the ultrastructural changes of rabbit retinal neu-roepithelial after subthreshold exposure lasers of different wavelengths. At the present stage of development of ophthalmology retinal laser photocoagulation remains the «gold» standard of care for retinal vascular disease. However, this method has a number of complications, so is especially urgent search for alternative methods of application of laser energy, which would not have undesirable side effects. Purpose. The aim was to study the effect of subthreshold laser effects on rabbit retinal neuroepithelial lasers generating radiation with a wavelength of 532 nm, 577nm and 810 nm using millipulse and micropulse laser modes by electron microscopy.
Methods. Work performed on the 3rd adult rabbits (5 eyes) Chinchilla, age 6—7 months, weighing 2.5—3kg. Laser scars apply in the lower segments of the eyes, which were divided arbitrarily into two parts to perform the confluent and not confluent laser photocoagulation, using laser radiation of different wavelengths. Laser effect on the rabbit retina was carried out in two modes of operation of the laser: in millipulse and micropulse, used only subthreshold power laser exposure. Results. Electron microscopy examination showed that the not confluent laser photocoagulation has less damaging effect on the rabbit retinal neuroepithelial than the confluent laser photocoagulation. The confluent laser burns 577 nm optical radiation in millipulse laser mode on the rabbit retina are observed less damage than when a similar influence of the laser wavelength of532 nm. However, if you do not confluent laser burns the method of application of burns when exposed to a laser wavelength of 577 nm in millipulse mode of the neuroepithelial is far less damaging changes. There is preservation of the outer and inner segments of pho-toreceptor cells. Electron microscopy examination showed that after exposure to the laser wavelength of 810 nm micropulse mode laser, with no confluent method of application of burns on the retina of the rabbit observed the least damage to the neuroepithelial than in similar influence of the laser wavelength of 532 nm and 577 nm.
Conclusion. Found that the least damaging effect on the rabbit neuroepithelial has radiation with a wavelength of 810 nm. Changes in Muller cells were observed after almost all laser effects on rabbit retina.
References
1. Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion // Am J Ophthalmol. - 1984. - Vol. 98. - P. 271- 282.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(84)90316-7
2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Focal photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema (Relationship of treatment effect to fluo-rescein angiographic and other retinal characteristics at baseline: ETDRS report no 19) // Arch Ophthalmol. - 1995. - Vol. 5113. - P. 1144- 1155.https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100090070025
3. Guyer D. R. Subretinal fibrosis after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema / D. R. Guyer, D. J. D'Amico, C. W Smith // Am J Ophthalmol. - 1992. - Vol. 113. - P.652- 656.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74789-0
4. Han D. P. Submacular fibrosis after photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema / D. P. Han, W. F. Mieler, T. C. Burton // Am J Ophthalmol. - 1992. - Vol. 113. - P. 513-521.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74722-1
5. Ishiko S. The use of scanning laser ophthalmoscope micro-perimetry to detect visual impairment caused by macular photocoagulation / S. Ishiko, H. Ogasawara, A. Yoshida, et. al. // Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. - 1998. - Vol. 29. -P. 95-98.https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-19980201-03
4. Изменения мюллеровских клеток наблюдаются после применения всех лазерных воздействий.
6. Lewen RM. Subretinal neovascularization complicating laser photocoagulation of diabetic maculopathy // Ophthalmic Surg. - 1988. - Vol. 19. - P. 734- 737.https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-19881001-11
7. Lewis H. Choroidal neovascularization after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema / H. Lewis, A. P. Schachat, M. H. Haimann, et al. // Ophthalmology. - 1990. - Vol.97. - P. 503- 510.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(90)32574-5
8. Morgan C. M. Atrophic creep of the retinal pigment epithelium after focal macular photocoagulation /C. M. Morgan, H . Schatz // Ophthalmology. - 1989. - Vol. 96. - P. 96-103.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32924-1
9. Schatz H. Progressive enlargement of laser scars following grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema / H. Schatz, D. Madeira, H. R. McDonald, Johnson et. al. // Arch Ophthalmol. - 1991. - Vol. 109. - P. 1549-1551.https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1991.01080110085041
10. Sinclair S. H. Laser treatment of diabetic macular edema: comparison of ETDRS-level treatment with threshold-level treatment by using high-contrast discriminant central visual field testing / S. H. Sinclair, R. Alaniz, P. Presti // Semin Ophthalmol. - 1999. - Vol. 14. - P. 214- 222.https://doi.org/10.3109/08820539909069540
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Т. А. Романова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
DEPOSIT POLICY
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.







